Article reproduced from The
Remnant, April 30, May 15 and 31, 1998
Appeal for an Ex-Cathedra
Judgment on Vatican II
Toni des Frêsnes
The following appeal for a solemn definitive judgment on the decrees and teachings
of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council is addressed to Catholics generally, both
religious and lay. Its purpose is to engage support from those souls who have the grace
and power to come to the aid of the Church, in defense of the Faith by prayer and action.
Above all, it is hoped this information might strengthen those who strive to serve Jesus
Christ amidst tribulation. This text is not intended to be a legal case, but rather a
personal plea from the ranks of the Church Militant. The course of action cited here is
most feared by our foes capable of destroying their citadel in a single blow.
Towards this objective, we pray some good bishops with true allegiance to the Queen of
Heaven, are inspired to lead the way to her final victory. Meantime we look forward during
this Year of the Holy Spirit, to His counsel and consolation as He tends those wounded
members of the Mystical Body of Christ. And, as the Year of the Father approaches, we may
well see, as in days of old, the chastisement of His wayward people and rejoice in the
subsequent return of His prodigal children. Could it be that the Triumph of the Immaculate
Heart is to coincide with the dawn of the coming new millennium? Whenever God wills it,
the Church will be cleansed and we shall be like lambs released from the barn after winter
firstborn of the real "new springtime"! May Lord Jesus Christ, Mother
Mary, St Joseph and the Angel of Peace who all endorsed Fatima by their appearance
assist the Holy Father, the bishops and the whole Church to do Gods Will.
Jacinta and Francisco Marto, pray for us.
His Eminence Basil Cardinal Hume was recently quoted by the British press as saying,
"No Catholic is free to dissent." In the correct sense, that is true. We are not
free to criticize or reject dogma, the magisterium, infallible doctrine or the articles of
our faith. On the other hand, we are perfectly free to repudiate a counterfeit doctrine,
which is represented as "infallible", but is nevertheless alien to the authentic
traditional Magisterium. Indeed, we have the duty to recognize, resist and reject any such
falsehood. Unfortunately, the distinction between truth and error is clouded in our day.
Ever since the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, a plague of doctrinal confusion has
descended upon us. There have been countless crusades, critiques and debates dealing with
the tainted fruits of the Modernist revolution in the Church. For over thirty years now,
this liberal ideology, like a parasite, has been living off and choking its host, the One
True Vine. We cannot impede its progress by rehabilitating or removing any one of its
particular outgrowths, such as "ecumenism" or "liturgical reform". The
source of this new religion, masquerading as "Catholic", must be permanently
removed, in order for true Catholicism to grow in the future and to flourish once more.
We might argue that our present woes began long before the Council. But the fact
remains that without Vatican II the auto-demolition of our Faith and our Church could not
have been implemented. This unprecedented "pastoral" Council was by no means
infallible in all its teachings. In contrast to Vatican II, the previous twenty valid
ecumenical Councils of the Church held over the past nineteen centuries, were all dogmatic
and therefore infallible containing no trace of error in their texts, teachings and
By what strange privilege then does this golden calf of our era, fashioned at the
zenith of "aggiornamento", now command the esteem of a sacred cow at the nadir
of our spiritual and temporal demise? Indeed, it is high time for Vatican II to be
re-visited and judged, with its errors exposed and condemned. How and by whom? Only a Pope
or a Pope-in-Council can judge the Second Vatican Council and its legacy, the cult of man.
Why has our Supreme Pontiff not used his Petrine power to clear up the appalling
confusion perverting faith and morals throughout the Church today? Surely Rome is not
blind to the fact that once the errors of the Council are vanquished and its
"spirit" exorcised, the present apostasy or revolution in the Church will be
It is unfortunate that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was deftly sidetracked into a
liturgical dispute, apparently choreographed in Rome. If only he had invoked his
episcopal right to a solemn judgment on the documented errors of Vatican II, he would have
won a universal victory for the Faith (including of course, for the traditional Latin
Mass). The very last thing Rome wanted was to be forced to deal with a legal
ecclesiastical case which would publicize the theological flaws of the Council.
One Good Shepherd
Nevertheless, the same opportunity remains open to this day. If God so wills, all it
would take is one good shepherd who sincerely wished to know without any doubt that what
he had implemented or was sustaining from Vatican II was indeed free from all error in the
sight of God. Such a bishop would need the grace to slip the collegial noose long enough
to publicly insist as a Prince of the Church on his right to a definitive
judgment on the texts and teachings of the Council. Is such a man to be found? At the very
least, an information campaign would certainly help Catholics, both religious and lay, to
understand why we need to be released from the grip of Vatican II. Such a crusade,
appealing to the faithful, especially those devoted to Our Lady of Fatima and her message,
might even inspire some brave bishop(s) to precipitate an infallible papal judgment on the
Council. Thus the Pope would have the choice to proclaim ex-cathedra, that the documents
of Vatican II are free from all error (which we know the Holy Spirit will prevent
physically if necessary, as errors do exist), or to condemn these errors with the full
force of his supreme authority. The bottom line here is that an infallible judgment will
break the conciliar bonds which keep us hostage.
Pope John Paul II began his pontificate with the phrase "Be not afraid!" and
he has been repeating it to us ever since. If His Holiness truly believes the Council to
be absolutely free of all error, why not dare to say so ex-cathedra? We know as Pope that
he has the personal power to judge the Council if he is required to do so. He is also in
the unique position to make an infallible judgment on his own teachings based on the
Council, if he has the courage to do this. John Paul II admits in Tertio Millennio
Adveniente, his 1994 Apostolic Letter on the coming third millennium, that "since
the publication of the very first document of my Pontificate, I have spoken explicitly of
the Great Jubilee
In fact, preparing for the Year 2000 has become as it were, a
hermeneutical key of my Pontificate." Since the Pope has been preparing for this
event all along, now is obviously a prime time for John Paul II to hear an echo of his own
words. "Be not afraid, Holy Father! Be not afraid to judge Vatican II and its
But in truth, the Council is vulnerable. The fallibility of Vatican II is the
Achilles heel of the enemy. Even those prelates who have actually lost the Faith,
yet proceed sacrilegiously with their careers lodged inside the post-conciliar
machinery remain fearful of the claim that the Supreme Pontiff cannot err in
judging faith and morals within an ex-cathedra decree. For the craftsmen of conciliarism,
any such attack against the Council would be taboo. So what of it? This doggerel says it
"Their big taboo for Vatican Two,would set us free for the Great
Jubilee!" Even the demons of hell know that an ex-cathedra judgment on the
documents and teachings of Vatican II, would deliver the coup de grace to the myth
of its "authority".
Pope John Paul I
Our dear Pope John Paul I, of 33 days reign, may have intended to review the
Council. He did remark that he was going to clean out the "Augean stables" with
reference apparently to Vatican finances. But he died unexpectedly and his body was
swiftly cremated before an autopsy could be done. We do not know which men made the
unprecedented decision to have the Popes body burned to ash instead of burying him,
but we can be sure Albino Lucianis fate served a message to troublemakers who might
oppose the party line.
Consequently a line from the Apocalypse comes to mind: "Who is like the beast, and
who can fight against it?" (Ap. 13:4) Who then is capable of challenging Vatican II?
This task would tax the limits of even the most erudite scholars, because of the
theological complexities involved. On the one hand, when the Council reinforced
pre-conciliar theology, doctrine and practices, taught by popes and dogmatic councils of
the past, such teachings are infallible and belong to the authentic traditional
magisterium. On the other hand, when conciliar texts departed into unprecedented novelties
and into contradiction with what the Church had previously taught, it is from this arsenal
that the leaven of modernism was diffused. Only an extremely gifted theologian is able to
distill the nectar of Catholic Truth from the liberal errors in this potion.
Defender of the Faith
There is such a priest in France the Abbé Georges de Nantes, founder of La
Contre-Réforme Catholique (Catholic Counter-Reformation), who had the wisdom and
courage to expose the errors of Vatican II. After the Council closed, his writings were
submitted to the Holy Office upon his own request for formal judgment. Quite simply it was
a case of either the Abbé was wrong in his accusations, or the Council documents were in
But instead of judging the thesis, they judged the author! The Abbé de Nantes was
arbitrarily commanded to retract all his accusations under "blind" obedience,
even though not a single error could be found in the Abbés evidence, which had been
scrutinized with a fine tooth comb by the Vaticans most astute conciliar minds. At
the outset, the Abbé had expressed his filial willingness to retract any theological
errors he might have made, but since the Vatican was unable to find even one, he refused
to back down with his allegations, which in reality would have been equivalent to a denial
of the Truth. Georges de Jesus, the Abbé de Nantes, was punished by being
"disqualified" a penalty unheard of in Canon
Law like a soccer player! The fact is, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith (formerly known as the Holy Office or Inquisition) has, in violation of the bona
fide requirements of the laws of the Church, refused to declare judgment or even to
answer any one of the three formal cases submitted by the Abbé over the past 30 years.
Furthermore, it is a bizarre fact that the only documents missing from Cardinal
Ratzingers allegedly complete public file of all submissions to his department over
the past three decades, are the specific documents submitted by the Abbé de Nantes. What
are we to make of the Cardinals erroneous claim that no documents were omitted from
his recently published file? He cannot deny that these apparently flawless cases were
legally filed and received by his Office and will have to be resurrected and finally
resolved in the future.
Meanwhile, the French Abbé, a formidable and articulate defender of the Faith, has
been slandered and unjustly persecuted non-stop. He holds the distinction of being the
only prelate who has compiled a theologically airtight dossier of published works, capable
of toppling Vatican II. Since he has also had the temerity to point out the errors of
post-conciliar popes, which curiously not a soul in the Vatican has attempted to refute or
deny, the Abbé de Nantes is without doubt one of the most feared and hated men in Rome.
Vatican emotions aside, the reality of this impasse is that a priest, albeit a brilliant
theologian, does not have the same power a bishop or an archbishop has, as Successor of
the Apostles and Prince of the Church, to insist upon his right to a solemn infallible
judgment from the Pope on Vatican II texts and teachings.
This is what we need. In the absence of a Third Vatican Council, there is no other way
out for us (with the exception of. some miraculous divine intervention). The errors and
ambiguities of Vatican II cannot be eradicated by trying to interpret them "in the
light of tradition", because the modernism animating this conciliar reformed religion
contradicts previous papal teachings, the magisterium and in short, the Catholic Faith. We
were warned about this at the beginning of the 20th century. Pope Saint Pius X prophesied
that Modernism, "the common sewer of all heresies", would, after a temporary
setback under his reign, return to attack the Church from within later this century, but
in a more virulent form.
Pope Leo XIII
Previously, on 13 October 1883, Pope Leo XIII had collapsed at the Agnus Dei
whilst celebrating Holy Mass in the Sistine Chapel. The cardinals who carried him out
thought he was ill, but the Pope described instead a frightful vision be had seen. Leo
XIII said he saw Satan asking for and obtaining the twentieth century in order to do his
worst against the Church of Christ. When the Pope witnessed the extent of the future
devastation, he fainted from shock. This vision caused him to compose the prayer to Saint
Michael the Archangel and to order its public recital after each Low Mass throughout the
world. These Leonine prayers were immediately suppressed by the reformers after Vatican
II. The Oath Against Modernism, mandatory for each candidate at ordination, was
canceled and the powers conferred by the Church on every priest as Exorcist were
eliminated. These particular changes had the effect of sabotaging our defence against
diabolic activity and undermined clerical resistance to heresy.
Now, as the result of the Council spawning a hybrid legacy of error mixed up with the
truth, we have an added responsibility. We must learn which principles to apply to the
example and teachings of Popes who base their ideology on Vatican II. Firstly, we know
absolutely that the Supreme Pontiff is always protected by the charism of Papal
Infallibility in his Extraordinary Magisterium (ex-cathedra decrees), which, over the past
two thousand years have been so few that we can literally count them on our fingers.
Secondly (and this is where it gets dangerous), we need to be aware that Peter is
protected by infallibility in his "ordinary magisterium" (day-to-day teachings),
only on the condition that he continues to teach what the Church has always taught. The
moment the Pope disregards this strict proviso and departs into teaching novelties
(unheard-of concepts) or contradicts previous doctrine, he is not remotely covered by
infallibility and can make prudential mistakes and dreadful errors in his private capacity
as a mere "pastoral counselor." Although rare, examples do exist in the
preconciliar Church, such as Pope John XXII, who was accused of heterodox teaching. After
throwing one of his accusers into the papal dungeon in Avignon, John XXII continued to
stick by his affirmation, but on his deathbed he admitted he was wrong and recanted.
In contrast, one of the greatest follies today rests in the fatal post-conciliar notion
that every word uttered by the Pope is somehow guaranteed to be above reproach. That is
simply not Catholic. The Pope is not impeccable. Besides, none of our post-conciliar Popes
has ever made an ex-cathedra pronouncement, and their locutions and writings may only be
accepted as infallible, when they fulfil the stringent conditions prescribed. Therefore,
for safetys sake with reference to papal quotes based on conciliar teaching
these may be attributed to the philosophies of the men themselves Giovanni Battista
Montini in the case of Paul VI and Karol Wojtyla with respect to John Paul II.
Definition of Vatican II
What was given as the raison dêtre for the Second Vatican Council? In Tertio
Millennio Adveniente, John Paul II gives us a definition of Vatican II as follows:
No Council has ever spoken so clearly about Christian unity, about dialogue with
non-Christian religions, about the specific meaning of the Old Covenant and of Israel,
about the dignity of each persons conscience, about the principle of religious
liberty, about the different cultural traditions within which the Church carries out her
missionary mandate and about other means of communication.
John Paul II elaborates further on the Councils "striking new tone" and
The Second Vatican Council is often considered as the beginning of a new era in
the life of the Church
In the history of the Church, the old and the
new are always closely interwoven. The new grows out of the
old and the old finds a fuller expression in the new.
Thus it was for the Second Vatican Council.
However, Jesus Christ taught:
No man puts a piece from a new garment upon an old garment, otherwise he both
rends the new, and the piece taken from the new garment agrees not with the old. And no
man puts new wine into old bottles; otherwise the new wine will break the bottles and it
will be spilled and the bottles will be lost. But new wine must be put into new bottles;
and both are preserved. And no man drinking the old has presently a mind to the new; for
he says: the old is better. (Lk. 5:36-39)
God tore the temple veil to mark the end of His Old Covenant. His New Covenant included
a new sacrifice, new priesthood and a new mandate. However, once established by Christ
Himself, the Church was required to keep the deposit of Faith intact, as handed down by
the Apostles, until the end of the world. It is only in the strict chronological sense of
the word that the New Covenant became "old" (aged) over the 2,000 years of our
history. But that is all. The Christian deposit of Faith remained non-negotiable to
"reform" until the Protestant revolution. Yet our Catholic doctrine (in toto)
was unassailed from within until Vatican II when, with immense pride and presumption, for
the first time in the history of the Church a brand new set of beliefs was conjured up
(without dogmatic authority) under the catch-phrase "renewal".
The Second Vatican Ecumenical Council was convened by Pope John XXIII and opened to a
fanfare of publicity in 1962. In his opening address (written by Cardinal Montini, the
future Paul VI) John XXIII proclaimed the Council to be "pastoral," not
dogmatic, thus shutting out the unequivocal protection of the Holy Spirit in His
infallible guidance of dogmatic decrees. This Council was going to be so new it was going
to be the very first in the entire history of the Church to avoid any
responsibility to define dogmatic teachings. And it was also going to be the very first to
avoid making a single penalty or anathema necessary to safeguard the purity of the Faith.
There was no condemnation of Communism or, as Our Lady of Fatima warned, "the errors
of Russia", by Vatican II. Of all ages our godless era was surely the most needful of
This "pastoral" Council therefore, in refusing to accept dogmatic
responsibility (which effectively excluded the Holy Spirit as Counselor), ensured its
participants were simply left with the spirits of men to guide them. Nevertheless, a
so-called "Pastoral Council" was obviously going to have to formulate its
teachings by some means, such as pastoral theology, which may be defined as follows:
Pastoral theology deals with the care of souls. It takes the teaching of dogmatic, moral
and ascetical theology and the rules of canon law and applies them to the everyday work of
the clergy in all its aspects.
Vatican II was used as a springboard to jettison the past and to introduce a
revolutionary philosophy for the "Pilgrim Church" on earth. The laity had their
life blood injected with a batch of experimental, synthetic sera. After the Council closed
in 1965 and based on its authority, everything was made new. The Classical Roman liturgy
was suppressed and a new Mass was fabricated by a committee. The Sacraments were changed
and rewritten. The Divine Office was constructed in a different format and divorced from
Latin. A new Code of Canon Law was produced and an official new universal
"Catechism" appeared. In fact, a whole new religion took shape.
These strange new ideas, having been slipped into Conciliar texts and passed off as
"infallible", now infest most of what we see, hear or read. From a logical
standpoint, one cannot take a flawed set of documents as the basis for ones
teachings. The more the original errors are quoted as the "authority", the
greater the subterfuge of the evolving imposture. In our case, we have been enveloped by a
rapidly expanding house-of-straw lodged on our "updated" Rock. All it will take
is one lighted match (an ex-cathedra judgment) or one lightning strike (a divine
intervention) to have the entire façade reduced to ashes. But the Rock will endure unto
the end of time. Laus Deo!
What to Believe?
As the direct result of an unprecedented non-dogmatic "Pastoral" Council, we
are facing an historically unique situation. Authentic Catholicism is now inundated by an
ocean of error, which has almost submerged faith and morality throughout the Universal
Church. We need an infallible judgment on the flawed texts of the Second Vatican
Ecumenical Council. Until this fountain is turned off, we cannot stem the flood, nor save
the drowning flock, nor repair our water-logged barque. In surveying this contemporary sea
of confusion, it is necessary to know, as true Catholics, where we stand, prior to any
examination of the erroneous teachings and practices in vogue since the Council. A wise
priest once said, "Dont leap before knowing exactly where you are jumping
from!" In this case unless we are well-schooled in the Faith of our Fathers
we will be seduced into the changes which now assault the Mystical Body of Christ.
How then do we remain thoroughly Catholic in heart, mind and soul? If we have ears to hear
and eyes to see, the path is clear-cut.
As faithful Roman Catholics we know and believe that the One, Holy, Catholic and
Apostolic Church is indefectible and that the gates of hell will not prevail against her.
We embrace her entire doctrine, entrust ourselves to her prayer and her sacraments, and
submit to her holy discipline, which is good and just in her sure and age-old tradition.
We believe that outside the Catholic Church the Spouse and Body of Christ
there is no salvation. Therefore, we abhor and reject all heresy and idolatry,
particularly that of our modern age, which replaces worship of God the Father, Son and
Holy Ghost, with the cult of man his reason, his liberty, his rights and the
exaltation of humanity, i.e. the Modernism besetting the Church today. We reject all
profanation of the Churchs teaching, particularly the blasphemies against Our
Blessed Lady, the Immaculate Heart of Mary, her Immaculate Conception, her perpetual
virginity, her glorious co-redemption and her universal mediation of all graces. Whilst we
decry the profanation of the liturgy of the Holy Mass, we recognize Paul VIs New
Ordo (the Mass of the Pope and all the bishops) as lamentable, but valid. We reject all
schism and separation from the Roman Catholic communion under any pretext whatsoever. We
will not substitute the authority of any man (in matters of sacramental and canonical
jurisdiction of supposed divine apostolic tradition) in the place of the sole sovereign
and divine authority of the Pope now reigning and the bishops in communion with him. We
recognize them as true pastors of the flock and will have none other. We swear them
obedience according to the canons of the Church (but not in the abuse of their authority)
for the worship of God and the salvation of souls, with the reservation of denouncing
their perversity as is our duty to do. We recognize particularly Paul VI and John Paul II,
in sympathy with Modernism, but nevertheless legitimate Popes. We have no alternative but
to note and denounce the impious and devastating disorders amongst the highest authorities
of the Church, declaring our position to be one of legitimate suspicion and withdrawal of
obedience with regard to this so-called "reform" of the Church, until truth and
justice be done in charity and according to God. (Either by dogmatic definitions
accompanied by penalties pronounced by the Sovereign Pontiff in person or until truth is
heard and justice done by a reparative Third Vatican Council, proclaiming with all the
authority of their solemn Magisterium). We recognize that the very principles of Vatican
II, "adaptation to the world", the "return to the Gospels",
"Ecumenism" and "Secularism", are false. For this reason we cannot
accept the fallible recommendations of the supposedly "Pastoral" Council, which
led to disastrous consequences. We must always make a distinction in the case of Pope John
Paul II, as to whether he is exercising his infallible Magisterium as Vicar of Christ
to which we submit entirely or whether he is acting in his private capacity
as "Pastoral Counselor", which, in the interests of the Church, we have reason
to fear and reject. We profess the Catholic Faith in its entirety and we declare that
there can be no conflict between faith and obedience, for the latter is inspired by the
former. In cases where we must refuse an obedience unjustly demanded we appeal from the
fallible instructions of a "Pastoral Council" (or a Pope in his capacity as a
private teacher) to those infallible instructions of the Council (or to the Pope
exercising his divine Magisterium).
These points in a nutshell, are what we need to know. They embody the Cretan Line
between heresy and schism, mapped out by the Abbé de Nantes. Nowhere has this writer
found a more concise description of what is required to keep the faith today. But without
access to such pristine analyses, many loyal Catholics find themselves trapped in a
conciliar straight-jacket. Many find it hard to believe that Vatican II texts actually
taught error, yet most have no difficulty in discerning the obvious disorders which
followed in the wake of the Council. Therefore some concrete examples have been selected
here to illustrate just how these alien conciliar tenets have seeped down to us and are
now being passed off as authentic teachings of the Church. These examples are not an
exhaustive list, but many have a familiar ring of much that has been repeated to us since
A cautionary note is prudent in dealing with this subject
We may never judge the
undeclared interior motives of any individual, prelate or pontiff (unless he declares his
motives openly). If his teaching, actions and commands are out of step with unchangeable
Catholic Tradition, the prelate may be resisted and his errors must be rejected. Forming a
balanced judgment on such a prelate does not amount to condemning him. Only God, Who sees
the heart, may judge a mans motives.
The following revelations will be a rough ride for many a reader. It was distasteful
too for this unworthy author to review scandal and disorientation, whilst trying to hold
back a natural tide of indignation. The point is, when one is obliged to review and
pinpoint error, this is not synonymous with a lack of respect for the hierarchy or their
divinely instituted roles. Only Marxist dictators or tyrants forbid all criticism of their
conduct or regimes. On the contrary and in our case, speaking out is necessary even in
order to remain faithful to the Head of the Church, Our Lord Jesus Christ and for the
salvation of souls ours included.
The Second Vatican Councils Gaudium et Spes No 22 1. taught, "By His
incarnation, the Son of God has united Himself in some fashion with every man" (a
totally new and unheard-of concept in Catholic doctrine). Observe the results. Pope John
Paul II, in his address to the Roman Curia (21 Dec. 93) said, "God became man, so
that man might become God. By virtue of the birth of the Son of God among men, every man
is called in some way to become in Christ, Son of God. The Word incarnate, as the Apostle
John tells us, gave us power to be made the sons of God. And if we are all Sons of God, we
are all brothers. All!" (punctuation and emphasis are the Popes). But Saint
John actually says the opposite, as follows: "
But as many as received him, he
gave them the power to be made sons of God. To them that believe in his name." (Jn
1:12) "All" men therefore do not have this power. John Paul II habitually
confuses (or fails to distinguish between) what is common to all creatures and what is
proper only to those who have been effectively redeemed by Gods grace and thereby
raised to the supernatural life. It is only through the supernatural life that we become
"adoptive sons of God" and consequently "brothers and sisters", since
becoming sons of the same Father.
If we accept the Councils brand new idea that Christ, by His Incarnation, is
somehow united with every man and, consequently, that all are brothers, the next logical
step is "all are saved." Indeed, according to the Vatican newspaper LOsservatore
Romano, at the Roman cemetery of Verano (Nov 1, 93) before 5,000 people, John Paul II
It is a day when we are particularly close to those who have passed
before us on this earth and are now standing before the throne of the Lamb. Their hearts
are filled with the Glory of God
I would like to embrace in common prayer all the
cemeteries of Rome and those who dwell there. Not only the departed of this city, which is
called Eternal, but indeed the earth and all that is therein; all, wherever their earthly
remains are laid
Christs redemptive sacrifice embraces them all
these people and where do they come from? From every place; (Ap 1:13,14). They have washed
their robes white again in the blood of the Lamb. At present they are standing before You.
There was not one word on the faithful departed, simply all the departed who have all
washed their clothes in the Blood of the Lamb, inferring they are all saved. The following
quote, also from Apocalypse (which was never mentioned at Verano) contradicts the heresy
of universal salvation; "Blessed are they that wash their clothes in the blood of the
Lamb; that they may have a right to the tree of life and may enter in by the gates into
the city. Outside of which are dogs, sorcerers and unchaste, and murderers and servers of
idols, and every one that loves and makes a lie." (Ap 22:14,15) The truth is simple.
Not all are saved many are damned.
After Vatican II this "all" was subtly drafted into the reformed liturgy.
Christs Own Words for the Consecration of the wine were changed from "for you
and for many" in the Latin, to "for you and for all" in the vernacular
Novus Ordo versions. Sacred Scripture distinctly states "for you and for many."
Our Lord never said "all" are called and "all" are chosen, but the
spirit of the Council is teaching that notion.
LOsservatore Romano reported (21 Sept. 93) on Pope John Paul II at the
Lutheran Cathedral at Riga in a common "ceremony" with 16 Lutheran and Orthodox
"bishops," where he said:
Christians are supposedly divided by choices not always well thought out
made in a past which is now wholly regretted. We know full well that in the economy
of salvation, where sin and everything which incites to sin abounds, grace superabounds.
It is always God, who with an infinite patience, reconstructs the fabric of human history
woven by his love every time it is torn through sin.
John Paul II affirms that ecumenical modernism is good, whereas the opposite attitude
of the past is deplorable and sinful. In saying this, he makes no distinction between the
truly deplorable and sinful actions of those who separate from Christs One Church
through heresy and schism, and the attitude of the Church herself, who defended herself
and her children from heresy and schism. Responsibility is attributed to both sides, as
though in the case of a murder, responsibility was as much the victims as the
During the same Riga interview, Pope John Paul II said, "At the end of this Second
Millennium, we must surely make an examination of conscience in where have we
deviated from the Gospel?" To whom does this "we" refer? Karol
Wojtyla? Vatican II? The private miseries of the people? Or to 2000 years of the Catholic
Churchs history, doctrine and practice? The obvious meaning of this inference would
be that the Church is not indefectible or has failed in her mission to spread the Gospel.
John Paul II revealed in his Apostolic Letter on the Millennium that "
Church should become more fully conscious to recall all those times in history when
they" (her past members) "departed from the Spirit of Christ and his
Gospel" (and committed) "
forms of counter witness and scandal. Among the
sins which require a greater commitment to repentance and conversion should certainly be
counted those which have been detrimental to the unity willed by God for his People
ecclesial communion has been painfully wounded, a fact for which, at times, men of
both sides were to blame." (The Popes end quote comes directly from the
Councils Decree on Ecumenism 3)
Again at Riga, John Paul II said "Invoked by Christ at the last supper and many
times broken by his disciples in the course of history, unity is ever daily becoming a
common aspiration and commitment fraternally shared by so many Christians." Yet Pope
Pius IX already condemned the false notion that the prayer of Jesus Christ (Jn 17:21) had
not been heard, since the Church is divided. John Paul II claims unity was broken by
unidentified disciples and goes so far in this case, as to compare divisions today
"among Christians." Actually, the division is between Catholics and heretics.
Further on ecumenism, in the course of his address to the U.S. bishops of Nevada,
Hawaii and California (4 Dec. 93) Pope John Paul II said:
The Church in thanksgiving to God, recognizes that the Holy Spirit Who
shows the ways that lead to the union of Christians (Dominum et Vivificantem Second
Vatican Council), has given life to the new way of behaving amongst divided Christians.
Guided by your countrys long struggle for religious freedom and tolerance, American
Catholics have enriched the Churchs ecumenical movement.
To attribute to the USA a leading role in the struggle for religious freedom and
tolerance, is to recognize the Protestant and Masonic origin of the supposed rights. To
attribute false ecumenism to the Holy Spirit is blasphemous. True ecumenism means
converting souls into the One True Faith. Yet the head of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, defines ecumenism as follows: "In
that humility which respects the other, even though compatibility in doctrine and Church
practice is still not achieved, in the common movement, ecumenism consists in a readiness
to learn from the other and letting ourselves be corrected by the others spiritual
riches." How could the Seat of Truth, the Church of Christ, learn from and be
corrected by heretics? How can there be "respect" for heresy and schism
in other words, sin? For it is as heretics and schismatics that the Protestant sects and
the Orthodox are distinct from us.
Pope John Paul II often says "ecumenism is irreversible", despite the fact
that conversions to the Roman Catholic Church have plummeted since the Council along with
the apostasy of millions of souls who left her after Vatican II. Indeed, if this situation
is not reversed, even those left in the Church will be so thoroughly protestantized that
most will be Catholic in name only.
The following papal quote comes from Tertio Millennio Adveniente and is
referenced to the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council Declaration on the Relation of
the Church to Non-Christian Religions Nostra Aetate
esteem, the Church clearly regards the elements of Truth found in those religions as a
reflection of the Truth which enlightens all men and women." What does this
"reflection of the Truth" mean? Reflections are mirror images. Look at the word
Truth in the mirror and you see hturT! Reflections are deceptive. A "reflection of
the Truth" is confusing, since even the most successful lies usually have an element
of truth at the core, thereby appearing rather plausible. Truth specifically, by its very
nature, must be unadulterated and undistorted. St. John says that whoever "continues
not in the doctrine of Christ, does not have God (Truth)
if any man comes to you and
brings not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, nor say to him God speed you.
For he that says to him God speed you, communicates with his wicked works." (2 Jn
9-11) The Old Testament was explicit; "All the gods of the heathens are demons."
(Ps 95,5) Yet pursuant to reports in LOsservatore Romano (23 Nov. 93
and 22 Feb. 94) we read about pastoral attention towards "traditional
religions." There is no trace of "traditional religions" (formerly called
"pagan" or "idolatrous") anywhere in Sacred Scriptures or in the
Churchs pre-conciliar teachings. But now, as these reports state, "certain
terms, for example, pagan or fetishism, convey a negative meaning. A positive name is
needed (Traditional, Popular or Indigenous Religions) obviously, to describe religions no
longer regarded by the conciliarists as idolatrous. The post-conciliar Church comes up
with the explanation that these supposed ex-pagans "generally have a clear belief in
One God" (!) despite believing in spirits called gods, or divinities and ancestors.
The report explains that "fear of evil spirits is at the source of many acts of
worship." Saint Paul said "the things which the heathens sacrifice, they
sacrifice to devils and not to God." (1 Cor 10:20)
The post-conciliar attempts at "inculturation" under the presumption that all
cultures have the same possibility of being harmonized with Christianity, is the
neo-modernist error condemned by Pope Pius IX in Humani Generis. Christianity is
not subject to one culture, since it is universal. Even so, God chose one people
the Hebrews to entrust with His Revelation. God chose Rome to be the Seat of His
Vicar on earth. The Church is Roman. To pretend the Church is Native Indian, Bantu or
Polynesian, when she is Roman, does not conform to the Will of God. But now indigenous
pagan symbols and practices have been incorporated into local churches under the pretext
of "inculturation" (for example, North American Indian totems or medicine wheels
and sweat lodge rituals, or African sacred fires lit in the Sanctuary, mother-earth in the
Holy Water fonts and tribal dancing performed during the Liturgy). The result of
"inculturation" is the "repaganization" of peoples already converted
to Catholicism, with the results seen in Rwanda. In Africa, the majority of Christians now
attend Mass as well as their traditional cults.
During an interview in La Stampa (2 Nov. 93) John Paul II spoke of the
"defense of the human person and of his rights. And I have done nothing but
insistently repeat and recall that it is a principle to be observed; the principle of
religious freedom above all, but not only that! also all other freedoms due to the
human person." The exact opposite was taught by all pre-conciliar popes and councils.
For example, Pope Pius IX warned:
From their totally false notion of social government, they fear not to uphold
that erroneous opinion, most pernicious to the Catholic Church and to souls, which was
called by Our Predecessor Gregory XVI the insanity (encyclical 13 Aug. 1832)
namely, that liberty of conscience and worship is the peculiar (or inalienable) right of
every man, which should be proclaimed by law, and that citizens have the right to all
kinds of liberty; to be restrained by no laws, whether ecclesiastical or civil, by which
they may be enabled to manifest openly and publicly their ideas.
In his address to the U.S. bishops (4 Dec. 94), John Paul II referred yet again to the
"inalienable dignity of all human beings." This conciliar notion is a sophism.
Human dignity is not "inalienable" human nature is inalienable.
Pope Leo XIII taught us correctly in Immortale Dei: "The intellect and the
will that adhere to evil, fall from their native dignity and are corrupted". St.
Thomas Aquinas taught that with sin, man falls from dignity. Sin includes Original Sin, in
which all men have been conceived (with the exception of Our Lord Jesus and His Blessed
Pope John Paul II often emphasizes the phrase that each human being is "made in
the image and likeness of God". However, these words from Genesis, most accurately
describe Adam and Eve before the Fall, as their souls and not their bodies, were made in
this way. None of us therefore, (except for Immaculate Mary) is naturally predisposed
towards virtue. The truth is we are all, as the consequence of Original Sin, predisposed
towards evil. This was what the Church always taught before Vatican II; but now, as the
result of the Councils optimism, we are being taught that humanity is naturally
drawn towards the Truth. Hence, the path to Heaven (penance and expiation) and the
existence of Hell, are down-played and forgotten. In other words, we do not have to worry
about Hell, because we are naturally drawn towards Heaven and the Truth. Before the
Council, we never heard anything in papal teaching about the "transcendental quality
of the human person" as we do nowadays. What does this phrase mean? We only
"transcend" ourselves after death, when our souls are released from our bodies.
Our transcendence is strictly limited to our ascent up to Heaven (via Purgatory usually)
or our descent down to Hell and once in there, we have no power or
"transcendental quality of man" to get ourselves out, ever. Only God is
"transcendental" in the proper sense.
Fear of God
Vatican II ideology reveals an obsessive focus on mans dignity and mans
rights. We are even told that procured abortion is evil because it compromises the dignity
of the human person. But what about Gods rights for a change? We long to hear our
Pope preach that abortion offends God and is a mortal sin against God that it
breaks the Laws of God and violates the rights of God (not Man). Instead, we are now
taught that abortion is a sin against Man; against Mans Rights and Human Dignity. If
we fear sinning against fellow creatures more than sinning against our Creator, we have
plunged down the vortex of a diabolical inversion. "Fear of-the-Lord" is after
all, one of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit. A salutary "fear of the Lord is the
beginning of wisdom" (Prov 1:7) but a filial fear increases with the increase of true
charity or love. The more a soul loves God, the more it will fear offending Him. The void
of both filial and salutary fear of God, is a hallmark of this presumptuous ego-centric
During the Consistory (13, 14 June 94) called to set plans for the "Great
Jubilee", John Paul IIs address to the Cardinals mentioned the following faults
which he attributed to members of the Church: "Her people who have acted in a certain
sense in her name" that is, the Crusades, wars of religion and the Inquisition
presided over by the Pope. Yet these actions were committed not only "in the name of
the Church", but on the order and by the will and encouragement of the Church, guided
by the Holy Spirit. In committing these "sins against Christ and against the
Gospel", as John Paul II describes them, the faithful were following the directives
of the Church and many were canonized for it. If John Paul II is right, the Church has
distanced Herself from the Gospel for 2000 years, and, far from being an instrument of
salvation, has been an obstacle to eternal life no longer faithful to Her master,
but, as the heretics claim unfaithful and deviant. When Saint Louis set out on the
Crusade; when Pope Saint Pius V took the initiative to wage a holy war; or when Saint
Charles pursued heretics, they were not doing so because they were "sinners",
but because they were faithful to the commands of the Church.
As for apologizing for whatever sins our ancestors actually committed these
cannot be transmitted to us like Original Sin! Not even Christ pretended to be guilty when
He was innocent. Besides, no Pope can claim vicarious responsibility for those not under
his pastoral care. Yet the unbelievers now have the Vicar of Christ apologizing for events
in history for which no one alive today is responsible and, likewise, for which nobody
today suffered. Why must we be urged to insult our heroic Catholic sailors and
missionaries; all our colonizers, doctors and planters, without whom the One True Faith
would never have reached the outposts of civilization? Why should we be encouraged to spit
upon the graves of our forebears and all our tortured, violated, impaled and eaten
brothers, who met martyrdom at the hands of savages or Marxist terrorists and
"freedom fighters"? No amount of modern mea maxima culpas will ever
placate the enemies of our religion in this macabre exercise of public humiliation which,
in light of the true history of the Church, is not only unwarranted, unseemly, but
scandalizing to the faithful.
Speaking of martyrs, our conciliar Popes have a new theory. Paul VI pointed out in his
homily for the canonization of the Ugandan Martyrs: "The witness to Christ borne even
to the shedding of blood has become a common inheritance to Catholic, Orthodox, Anglicans
and Protestants". Following in his footsteps, John Paul II, in his address to the
Consistory (13, 14 June 94) said: "There are so many martyrs in the non-Catholic
Churches, Protestants, too many to include in a contemporary perspective." Yet this
appears to contradict the great martyr Saint Cyprian, who wrote: "One cannot be a
martyr without being in the Church." St. Augustine, Doctor of the Church, wrote:
"Established outside the Church, separated from Her unity and charity, you would be
punished with eternal torment, even though you were burned alive in Christs
Pope Paul VI
Obviously, the theories about Protestant martyrs are not the only views shared between
Paul VI and John Paul II. At Brescia (9 Oct 93) John Paul II revealed: "My
illustrious predecessor, who from my first encyclical, I wished to recognize as my true
father. Paul VI was an authentic gift from the Lord to His church and to all
Yet, Paul VI could not be considered a "Marian" Pope. When he popped into
Fatima on 13 May, 1967 for the 50th anniversary, he refused to stay overnight, refused Sr.
Lucias pleadings to speak with her, refused to go a few paces over to the Chapel of
the Apparitions, refused to say one "Hail Mary" not one (can be
verified by watching a videotape of the entire proceedings). Instead, Paul VI recited this
strange litany to the Cult of Man:
"Men, make yourselves worthy of the divine gift of peace,
Men, be men,
Men, be good, be wise, be open to the interests of the general well-being of the world.
Men be generous
Men, begin to come close to one another in your desire to build a new world,
Yes, a world of true men,
Which can never come about without the sun of God shining upon its horizon".
Indeed, this is no different from what is preached from every Masonic lodge in the
world. What an insult to Our Lady of Fatima! One wonders what She thought of Paul VI
giving to the Turks, the symbol of Her Victory at Lepanto which had rested in Her honor in
Rome for over 400 years. Did not Her Rosary save all Europe from the invading Moslems? In
like manner, Paul VI was also apparently inspired to give away to the United Nations
General Assembly the symbol of the Papacy our-triple crown, together with the papal
crosier and his papal ring. (The Popes Triple Crown was last heard of about 25 years
ago, after having been apparently procured by jewelers Levin & Son of Chicago
according to a subsequent claim in the late Hamish Frasers Approaches).
Paul VIs spiritual son, John Paul II, did no better than his mentor in 1981 on
his trip to Fatima. He did not quote a single complete line spoken by Our Lady of Fatima.
Even the prayer of the Angel was truncated. The Pope merely said, "My God, I believe,
I adore, I hope and I love you" and omitted the other half, "And I beg pardon
for those who do not believe, do not adore, do not hope in and do not love Thee."
He also did not disclose the little 20-line Third Revelation. He did not consecrate
Russia with all his bishops to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. And since his spiritual
father had disposed of the Papal Crown, there was no tiara for John Paul IIs
coronation during his investiture. He wears a mitre the Bishop of Rome one
amongst many (although he alone has the Power of the Keys). Instead of the Shepherds
Crook, we now have to endure a frightening symbol next to the Pope
Atop a long rod,
we see a hideous crucifix with an emaciated, weak Man hanging there terrible to
behold. It is a skinned corpse a picture of despair evoking despair in the
onlookers, with no sign of His Divinity. Oddly, the arms both point north towards the
head, in contrast to a traditional Catholic Crucifix, which shows Christs arms
pointing east and west, whilst His head and feet point north and south to cover all
directions and the whole earth.
This malformed papal cross is not "modern art" either; not is it just a
matter of "taste". It is simply grotesque. The Majestic Image on the Holy Shroud
is truly the antithesis of the brazen travesty of this cross.
Obviously, the conciliar legacy is not merely watered-down Christianity, but an alien
departure from what the Church has always taught for nineteen and a half centuries. The
New (so-called) Catechism of the Catholic Church is riddled with the
"old" faith being mixed up with the "new" ideology. Take #591 for
example, which explains the "Sanhedrins tragic misunderstanding of
(when they orchestrated His Death!) Really? So it was a "tragic
misunderstanding of Jesus" then? In other words
If only Jesus had not asked His
compatriots for more than they could understand
If only Jesus had explained Himself
In their efforts to be ecumenical and to exonerate the Jews, the authors
imply it is Jesus fault the poor Pharisees did not understand. The truth is that
Caiphas and his synod understood Jesus perfectly. The divinely instituted hierarchy of the
Old Covenant knew Jesus was the Messiah, but being so perverse, the majority hated Him and
plotted to kill Jesus. Indeed, if the members of the Sanhedrin were victims of a
"tragic misunderstanding", Christ would never have called them vipers and sons
Yet this sort of ecumenical heresy (even blasphemy) is so subtle that the average
trusting soul just swallows it without realizing that the effects of arsenic poisoning are
cumulative. Now, are we going to talk about this supposed "tragic misunderstanding of
Jesus" on Mount Sinai for the great monotheistic Jubilee jamboree "in the spirit
In the course of his presentation for the "Year 2000", the pontiff writes in Tertio
Millennio Adveniente that "many people may have held in good faith that an
authentic witness to the truth, could include suppressing the opinions of others, or at
least paying no attention to them." These "many people" he refers to
include all pre-conciliar Popes and Saints! Nowadays, Romes "authentic witness
to the truth" hypocritically suppresses the "opinions" of millions of
sincere traditional Catholics and pays "no attention" to them, whilst running
after the Protestant sects, the Moslems, Buddhists, Hindus, Animists, the State of Israel,
United Nations and all other comers.
As secular millennium hype builds up, Rome is publicizing the "Great
Jubilee." The official Vatican logo shows a conglomeration of doves clustered
together into a sphere at its centre. Reminiscent of the Olympic Games logo, the different
colored doves obviously represent all the continents and peoples of the world incorporated
into a peaceful global amalgamation. This visual concept could represent the intent to
convert the entire human race to the One True Church. On the other hand, this logo design
could dovetail perfectly into the profane one-world-system.
After the fall of Christendom, democracy and communism have been used as two goads to
herd humanity towards enslavement in a One World Order. Since the Council, the Church has
been subjected to both techniques in certain areas democratized and in others,
tyrannical demands for conformity without the Charity-of-Christ, have prevailed.
Vatican II not only ushered in a new religion, but a new way of governing the Church.
The laity were empowered at the expense of downgrading the unique and sacred powers of the
priesthood. And bishops, by means of their newly-found collegiality and national
conferences, had the ability to trespass on the power of Rome. In Tertio Millennio
Adveniente John Paul II claims: "During the Council
rediscovered episcopal collegiality". This is not true. Collegiality was not
"rediscovered" since this phenomenon never previously existed, even in Apostolic
times. Collegiality was invented by Vatican II designed to weaken the Petrine
authority of Peter. Collegiality is a complete fabrication. As a result of this democratic
development, the episcopate is now tempted to rival Rome to such an extent that (in North
America for example) it has been suggested the liberal Church dioceses are in a state of
undeclared or informal schism.
Our shepherds have been exhorting us lately to be "docile" and
"obedient" in order to discern the "ways of the Spirit" apparently
leading us towards a "New Springtime" for the "Year 2000". But is not
"obedience" the club raw Roman power has wielded since the Council, to demand
uniformity at the expense of true Catholic unity? The callous suppression of our
patrimony, the Classical Roman Liturgy, is one example of postconciliar tyranny. Now we,
in the English-speaking countries of the world, have been apparently selected as the first
to be subjected to the imminent "last phase" of the conciliar "reform of
the liturgy" program. Who will tell us whether the coming "Ordo Simplex"
which is to replace the Novus Ordo Missae is not perhaps going to be a very
"simple" worship service, devoid of Divine Content? If the poor
"docile" sheep are not nourished, they shall "simply" starve
"obediently". Let us be on our guard. Of course obedience and docility are noble
virtues, but when subverted into mere servitude and cowardice, they become vice. Vigilance
is necessary to discern whether calls for obedience and docility are licit or
manipulative, since these were the very same goads used to prod the sheep into tasting the
forbidden fruit of the Council.
"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheeps clothing, but inwardly
are ravenous wolves. By their fruits you will know them". (Mt 1:15,16)
Pope John XXIII promised us "Aggiornamento" and a "New Pentecost"
with Vatican II. We had instead the great apostasy.
Conciliarism vs. Tradition
The term "conciliarism" is used here to describe contemporary
pseudo-Catholicism which, like a chimera, was unleashed by the Second Vatican Ecumenical
Council. What then is the essence and purpose of the conciliar religion? As previously
reviewed in some detail, the essence of conciliarism constitutes a body of evolving
teachings, theology, doctrine and practice, which is contrary to authentic traditional
Catholicism. And its purpose is to provide a vehicle, disguised under a Catholic veneer,
to animate the realm of a New World Order. In a word, Conciliarism was crafted to serve as
the Movement for the Spiritual Animation of Universal Democracy.
Tradition, on the other hand, is defined as the revealed truths of faith and morals,
given by Christ or the Holy Spirit to the Apostles, and faithfully transmitted from them
to us, via the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Traditionalism in general is the
transmission of Catholic theology, doctrine and practice, by a successive series of
teachers or witnesses, whose testimony is contained in their spoken words, actions and
writings. The handing down of these truths, as well as the truths themselves, is called
"tradition." To claim that we are other that traditional Catholics is to state
that we are not Catholic at all. But since Vatican II, "traditionalist" has
become an epithet and a pejorative term. It is worth noting that in Dantes
"Inferno", those souls who perverted language were condemned to swim in their
own excrement for all eternity. To divorce tradition from custom, as the conciliarists
have done, is to divorce faith from practice, to separate Christs teachings from His
actions, to consider the Apostles and their immediate descendants as inferior to ourselves
in wisdom and to refuse the Truth its legitimate manner of expression.
Saint Paul says, "See to it that no one deceives you by philosophy and vain
deceit, according to human traditions, according to the elements of the world and not
according to Christ." (Col 2:8) St. Paul also warns, "And we charge you
brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every
brother walking disorderly and not according to the tradition received from us." (2
Thess 3:6) When conciliarists accuse faithful traditional Catholics of being
"divisive", they ignore this Scripture and fail to admit that their
institutionalized neo-modernism has divided the flock and decimated the sheepfold. As for
"conservative" Catholicism, which helps to sustain the liberal monopoly of power
by its vacillating apathy and antipathy towards Traditionalism, there is only this to
"conservatives" stand for nothing and fall for everything, since they
are "neither hot nor cold"
New World Order
Why is conciliarism indispensable to the New World Order? As the Movement for the
Spiritual Animation of Universal Democracy, it forms one of the mainstays for a One World
system. Since a single-legged New Order will falter, it requires two supports one
political/governmental and the other spiritual/ecclesial. Therefore, this nascent,
ecumenical, universal religion is to be the "spirit" of the body-politic. In
order to succeed, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic faith had to be harnessed,
undermined and convincingly misrepresented. It is not enough after all to govern
mens bodies. Their hearts and souls must be under control also. Now the Utopian
stage is set with the necessary props in place. The melting pot includes rampant heresy,
schism, apostasy and scandal in the postconciliar Church, which coincides with the
meltdown of secular society everywhere. This global disarray conforms exactly to the
blueprint for a new world order so diabolic in conception, it could only have been
spawned by Hell. No wonder Pope Leo XIII fainted when confronted with this future specter.
Synagogue of Satan
Indeed, before the end of Leo XIIIs reign, the infamous Eiffel Tower was erected
in Paris to serve as a monument to the coming One World Order. This intent is obvious in
its design, with four legs which represent the North, South, East and the West
being brought together into a single dominant spire. Few Catholics are aware that
this new Masonic Tower of Babel was satanically dedicated in a vile clandestine ceremony
with four consecrated Hosts buried in containers under the foundation of each quadrant.
Providentially, as the result of a deathbed plea by a repentant perpetrator, the Parisian
hierarchy exhumed and retrieved the four desecrated Hosts and subsequently built a church
in reparation for this sacrilege.
Significantly, France donated the monolithic and Masonic Mother-of-Liberty statue to
America, which itself boasts a Masonic Great Seal heralding the "Novus Ordo
Seclorum" (sic). However, the misspelling of "Seculorum" does not alter the
proclamation of a New Order for the Ages. It is no accident the streets of Washington D.C.
include the compass and the square when viewed from the air. These carefully laid plans
were long in the making and predated the Illuminati and even the official opening of the
first Grand Lodge in England in 1717. In fact, this Mystery of Iniquity is traceable
through the secret societies and the corrupted Knights Templars all the way back to
the Pharisees of old who fled from Jerusalem. Once in Babylon, these sworn enemies of
Christ became adepts of the occult lore in the Kabbalah, created the Talmud and evolved
into a destabilizing political force inimical to Christendom.
Notwithstanding its disputed authorship, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion do reveal
accurate details of a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy for world domination. This ambitious plan
could not succeed without the satanic dislocation of Christianity, the martyrdom of its
rulers and the subversion of clerical power at all levels of the Catholic Church. However,
Rome was aware of the danger long before a copy of the Protocols came providentially into
the hands of the papacy last century. Over the past 150 years, we have benefited from
numerous Papal warnings against the true aims of the Secret Societies. There were over a
dozen official condemnations of Freemasonry promulgated by our preconciliar Popes; the
most explicit being Leo XIIIs Encyclical Letter Humanum Genum in 1884, the
year after his horrifying vision of the future. Pope Pius IX called Judeo-Freemasonry
"The Synagogue of Satan" as even the Holy Name of "Jesus" uttered only
once in a Masonic Lodge, requires its immediate closure and rites of
"purification". But considering the fact that Conciliarism facilitates the
stranglehold of Freemasonry in the world today, the silence of our post-conciliar popes on
this subject is peculiar. More odd, is the public inclusion of two 32nd Degree Masons in
the honor guard for the American Cardinal Joseph Bernardin at his funeral service. These
men, according to Paul A. Fishers Behind the Lodge Door, have all sworn an
oath against "the cruel and cowardly Pontiff" before trampling a replica of the
Papal Triple Crown underfoot whilst shouting "Down with Imposture! Down with
crime!" This fanatical anti-Catholicism is demanded of all candidates duped into the
30th Degree (Knights Kadosh) of the Scottish Rite. The 32nd Degree teaches that
"Masonry will eventually rule the world." Since all "Shriners" have
descended past the 30th Degree to the 32nd Degree, we are not hoodwinked by their
"bread and circuses". Catholic men who sell out and join Freemasonry are
excommunicated ipso facto. Yet how is it possible that the grand mastermind behind
the Novus Ordo, Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, was posthumously exposed as a member of the
Lodge? Indeed, this "work of human hands" has brought about not only a schism in
the Church, but also an apostasy. The mere crumbs offered to Almighty God in the new
"Offertory" (actually the words of the Jewish mealtime grace) in place of
a Saving Victim, gives us yet another sign of this post-conciliar contraction of
Sanctifying Grace, which resulted in a universal hemorrhage of the Faith.
Was it not all foretold by the Third Secret of Fatima? Is that why it has been
concealed from us in defiance of Our Ladys command to make the contents known to the
whole Church and to the world in 1960 at the latest?
It is no excuse to pretend that Fatima was mere "private revelation", as this
message was not meant for a few people, but was a prophecy given by God through His
Mother, the Queen of All Prophets, for the Church and the entire world. It was
authenticated by the accurately predicted public Miracle of the Sun that
unprecedented prodigy of the greatest magnitude since the Resurrection. The preconciliar
Churchs approval confirmed the Virgin Mary came to Fatima. The little seers
words have proved correct. Consequently, there is no doubt that Our Lady said she would
triumph; that the Pope would consecrate Russia to Her Immaculate Heart and that a period
of true peace would be given to humanity. Obedience to Our Blessed Lady of Fatima is the
antidote for the ills ("errors of Russia") now spread throughout the world and
permeating the Church. Yet Pope John Paul II has not made the Papal and Episcopal
Consecration of Russia, nor has he published the Third Secret. His 1984 Consecration of
the World, with less than a quarter of the bishops, made no mention of "Russia"
(which has remained unconverted).
The Holy Fathers co-operation depends on his own free will. Moreover, he has the
personal authority to order his bishops to comply with him or face penalties. It is
a question of when he (or his successor) is given the grace
During this impasse,
should we consider it futile to strive for an infallible judgment on Vatican II? By no
means! God works through His Church. A powerful manifestation of this fact could be
illustrated by an ex-cathedra judgment on Vatican II made by a pope who, up to that
time, had been an ardent supporter of the Council. It all depends upon whether God gives
us the grace to proceed. A legal case, filed by a bishop against the errors of the
Council, requires a solemn judgment. It is not a matter for papal free will, but a matter
for the laws of the Church. Since the texts of this "Pastoral" Council are
fallible, the Pontiff cannot infallibly decree that Vatican II documents are free of
errors. The Council either taught error, or it did not a simple Ex-Cathedra
Judgment will expose the Truth! The conciliar citadel will succumb to this single blow.
Whenever God allows us this grace, the revolution or apostasy in the Church, will be over.
Conciliarism will implode without the "authority" of its fallible Pastoral
Council. If an ex-cathedra challenge is well-publicized (although exceedingly vexatious to
the Vatican bureaucracy), this would have the effect of alerting people to the truth and
of potentially saving many souls in the interim. The stakes could not be higher, but it is
a win-win situation. There is nothing to fear with an infallible ex-cathedra decree, no
matter what the Pontiffs philosophy happens to be, since the Holy Spirit will
protect Peter from shipwreck, in spite of himself if necessary. Indeed, the Vicar of
Christ, so frail now at the brink of eternity, should be given the opportunity to right
"But give me leave, O king, and I will kill the dragon without sword or club. And
the king said, I give you leave. Then Daniel took pitch, and fat, and hair, and boiled
them together; and he made lumps and put them into the dragons mouth, and the dragon
burst asunder. And he said: Behold him whom you worshipped." (Dan 14:25,26) The
medicine is somewhat different today, but this ex-cathedra judgment would have the same
effect on our apocalyptic dragon.
Who will be our Daniel? Priests and laity can only submit appeals to Rome, but the
Princes of the Church have the right and the power to obtain an official definitive
judgment on Vatican II. One bishop (or archbishop, or cardinal) is all it would take
Where are such men to be found? The Three Wise Men came from the East
Now, as we
celebrate the Anniversary of Christs Birth 2000 years ago, maybe we shall be blessed
with the appearance of inspired ecclesial Princes in place of the Kings of old. And since
there were real shepherds summoned during the first Advent, perhaps some of our good
Shepherds will be sent by the Angels to teach us once again to adore God-made-Man, instead
This Cult-of-Man has impaled our Roman Catholic Church by means of a double-edged
sword. On the one hand, we are subjected to conciliarism by erroneous doctrine and phony
teachings examples of which have previously been cited. On the other, we endure the
legacy of conciliarism in its practical, pastoral effects. Although a depressing list, the
following summary of facts is included here as an integral part of our pressing need for
an ex-cathedra judgment on Vatican II.
The glorious "Renewal" of the Church after the Council, is constantly
referred to by the hierarchy in glowing terms as a smashing success, which has already
happened. There cannot be any disagreement here with the two words "smashing"
and "happened." The fact is that after Vatican II, our beautiful churches have
been sacked or sold off. Our seraphic music is gone. Conciliar modern art is
"tacky" or often ugly. A new wave of iconoclasm broke out with the removal and
destruction of not only realistically inspiring paintings, crucifixes and statues, but
also priceless libraries, sacred vessels, vestments and Relics of the Saints. Most
recently, few Catholics realize that the main altar in the apse of St. Peters in Rome was
demolished. This magnificent marble Altar of the Chair of Peter, directly below the Window
of the Holy Spirit, was jack-hammered into rubble nearly five years ago. Second only in
rank to the papal altar, this venerable masterpiece no longer exists, whilst the Chair of
Peter juts out above a flat wall. The archpriest presiding over the basilica, Cardinal
Virgilio Noe, has not explained this wanton desecration of our patrimony (nor why the
traditional Latin Mass is officially banned in St. Peters.) Yet even if St. Peters was
razed and replaced with a glass pyramid, being only an edifice, this would not compare to
the intensely more devastating effects of the destruction and replacement of the Roman
Rite. Indeed, the spiritual iconoclasm of Vatican II became manifest beyond mere vandalism
it cleared the way for contemporary pseudo-Catholicism.
Conforming to this universal fiasco after the Council, Catholic hospitals and convent
schools were shut down, sold or turned over to the State. Catholic universities and
seminaries are now hotbeds of secular humanism, rationalism, naturalism and modernism.
Catechesis has gone to pot and all manner of license and perversion is taught via
sex-education programs to our children in so-called Catholic schools. The fact is, during
the reign of Paul VI alone, one third of our ordained priests were laicised. Nuns
likewise, stampeded out of religious life. Vocations have dwindled. As the membership of
our great religious orders (which were flourishing before the Council) dies out, we
continue to live off the capital invested from our pre-conciliar past, through our
senescent corps of geriatric priests and nuns. Consequently, the Mass is vanishing from
vast regions due to the acute shortage of parish priests. Missionary activity is now
largely social work. The new ecumenical altruism does not "violate" the
"rights" of non-Christians, who now die by the thousands in Catholic hospices
without baptism. The Spiritual Works of Mercy are subordinated to the Corporal Works of
Mercy. Service to Man now comes before devotion to God, as the Sovereign Individual
supplants the Sovereign Lord.
With the collapse of religious life, we experienced the collapse of family life.
Divorce figures sky-rocketed. Annulments were encouraged for frivolous reasons. Of those
families left intact, many are limited in size by either artificial or natural birth
control methods. We have been neutered both medically and spiritually. As a result of
Vatican II, our generation now mainly consists of grandparents, who knew their Catholic
Faith; their "kids" who knew some of the Faith; and their grandchildren, the
"kids" of today, who know next to nothing about their religion. Whilst our
senior population had access to a wholly sound pre-conciliar spiritual formation, the
majority of their descendants under the age of fifty, largely failed to pass on even that
percentage of the Faith, which they were taught. Handicaps such as vincible and invincible
ignorance have grown from epidemic to pandemic proportions under the reign of the
conciliar Church. Catechetical malnutrition has dulled our spiritual wits. For example in
the English-speaking world, it must be an endless source of diabolic glee nowadays when
Catholic parents do not recoil from acknowledging their children as "kids." Why
have we been subtly habituated into labeling our little ones and our teenagers as progeny
of goats? Certainly as Gods creatures, goats provide us with necessary resources.
Yet Christ singled them out to symbolize the damned, because goats are much more difficult
to control than sheep. Devil worshipping ritual is riddled with goat symbols. We even see
hordes of children at rock concerts, fists raised with two outer fingers extended
the sign of the goat horns foolishly giving a salute in homage to Satan! Who will
enlighten them? Do our conciliar shepherds strive to warn their flocks against the demonic
or against Hell? Seldom, if ever, nowadays. Sins of omission have no handy scapegoat. With
mediocre pastors, the sheep and the lambs are lost. Our poor "kids," repeatedly
predestined by that moniker, are mostly unshriven today and ill-equipped for Eternity.
What will be the fate of our generation at the Last Judgment when Christ, the Lamb of God,
separates the sheep from the goats?
Alas! Our negligent pastors and shepherds must give an account to God for every soul,
whether baptized or not, within the boundaries of their parishes and dioceses. On the
contrary since Vatican II, those truly conscientious and devotional priests, who
resisted the onslaught of Conciliarism, were ruthlessly brow-beaten in the name of
"obedience" and condemned to a dry martyrdom or banished. The ongoing harassment
of Fr. Nicholas Gruner (of the Fatima Crusader), is one example of surreptitious
malfeasance and an audacious abuse of power by our Vatican bureaucrats and their
Another well-known case of relentless and unjust maltreatment, is that of the Abbé
Georges de Nantes (of La Contre-Réforme Catholique) and his communities over the
past 30 years. To this day Rome is mute and refuses to judge the Abbés conciliar
accusations or to permit him any defense in court, whilst allowing calumnies to circulate
against him and the CRC. Fr. Gruner and the Abbé de Nantes have not been successfully
crushed, but consistent clerical persecution has nevertheless taken a heavy toll on the
vestige number of orthodox priests who have managed to survive in our age. These men
suffer a lonely crucifixion. Indeed, their plight is more poignant, but no less
excruciating than that of the faithful (including brothers, sisters and laity), who abhor
the Cult of Man and are struggling heroically to practice their Faith today.
Before the Council statistics showed that over 80% of all Catholics were practising and
attending Mass on Sundays. However since the Novus Ordo was imposed, Mass attendance
declined sharply to the point today where barely 17% of a billion Catholics worldwide, are
going to church regularly. Only 5% of these few now attend regular Confession. Yet nearly
everyone lines up, unshriven, for the Eucharist without fear of sacrilege. The majority no
longer receive Holy Communion on their knees and on the tongue, but take Jesus in hand as
they please. "Receiving" has become a bold act of "taking" in our
stand-up, answer-up, man-oriented new "worship services". Belief in the Real
Presence is consequently being lost. The sense of Sacrifice, reverence, mystery, beauty,
contemplative prayer and humble adoration has disappeared. The People of God do instead,
as their ill-formed consciences dictate. It is no wonder when conciliar spirituality
consists of liberty, fraternity and equality that un-holy trinity of democracy. Yet
democracy is an illusion. That word should be changed to "demon-ocracy", because
mankind is thereby enslaved to their elected rulers mostly knaves who fear
neither God nor hellfire (men such as Bubba, the American Beelze-bubba).
The grand architects of the stark "reformed" Roman Liturgy showed no such
apprehension when the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (with "altar, Host, chalice, priest
and acolytes") was shelved by the concept of the Eucharist as a "Meal"
(replete with "table, bread, cup, presider and now serviettes"). Although the
Classical Roman Rite was never abrogated, this traditional Latin Mass-of-the-Ages was
indeed suppressed and replaced by the reformers. By thus contradicting and violating Pope
Saint Pius Vs Bull Quo Primum Tempore, our shepherds ignored the effects of
the penalty decreed therein, namely "the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed
Apostles Peter and Paul". But the good God is not mocked ad nauseam. In due
course, by His chosen means, Our Lord Jesus Christ will certainly free His Church from
this "renewal" and the conciliar "spring-time".
Assisi to Sinai
It should come as no surprise to us then, if the coming camel caravan to Sinai proved
to be the last ecumenical straw to try Gods patience. The Holy See, in planning this
"ecumenical incentive" for the "great Monotheistic Religions," has not
uttered one single word about converting the Moslems and Jews to the One True Faith.
Besides, Romes use of the phrase "Monotheistic Religions" is gravely
misleading. The Moslems and Jews do not believe in the One True God. They deny the
Divinity of Jesus Christ. They reject the Holy Trinity. This Sinai jamboree prior to the
Great Jubilee, is being hailed in the "spirit of Assisi"
first Assisi extravaganza in 1986? The Roman Catholic Church, under Peter, invited all the
false religions. The Crucifix and the Blessed Sacrament were removed and a solid gold
statue of Buddha was placed on top of the tabernacle in the Church of Saint Peter in
Assisi, whilst the bonzes and Tibetan Lamas burned incense in our consecrated Sanctuary.
By contrast, on the same day, 27 October 1986, a statue of Our Lady of Fatima arrived in
Assisi, carried by young men all the way from Calabria. Our Catholic
"ecumenical" prelates refused Her entry and Her image on a flower-strewn bier,
was abandoned outdoors, opposite the very church given over to idolatry. (subsequently
devastated by recent earthquakes). In contrast, the Roman Martyrs would at least have had
some excuse for succumbing through fear of torture, yet they refused to give one pinch of
incense before the idols preferring to endure hideous protracted sufferings, rather
than to give even the semblance of betraying Christ.
Old Testament Harlot
Whenever the ancient Hebrews played the harlot, they provoked the Wrath of God. We read
in Ezechiel, Chapter 16:
You have become infatuated with your own beauty; you have used your fame to make
yourself a prostitute; you have offered your services to all corners
And in all your
filthy practices and your whorings you have never remembered your youth
is paid. But you in your whorings have even given presents away to all your lovers. You
have offered them gifts to attract them from everywhere. In your whoring your have done
the exact opposite from other women; no one was running after you, so you went out and
paid them. Well then, harlot, hear the words of Yahweh. The Lord Yahweh says this: For
having undressed and let yourself be seen naked while whoring with your lovers and your
filthy idols, and for giving them your childrens blood, I am going to band together
all the lovers who have pleasured you, both those you liked and those you disliked
intend to hand you over to their fury. They will whip up the crowd against you; you will
be stoned and run through with a sword; they will set your houses on fire and execute
justice on you in the sight of all the nations.
New Testament Harlot
Ezechiel described how the infidelity of the Chosen People of the Old Covenant
who were espoused to the Lord brought down Gods anger and chastisements upon
them. Are the Chosen People of the New Covenant any different? The Church is after all the
Bride of Christ and we do know that history has a way of repeating itself. So it is with
trepidation that we read of the condemnation of the great harlot of eschatological times,
called "Babylon the Great". Although the exegesis of the Apocalypse remains
largely a mystery, there are a number of intriguing points for us to ponder. Those
following in parenthesis are by no means certain facts, but merely suggestions.
Nevertheless, we do have some certainties to guide us lest we fall into the same error as
the Protestant misinterpretation that Babylon the Great represents the Catholic Church. We
do know in Jewish and Christian biblical circles that "Babylon" was a synonym
for "Rome". Babylon is often equated with ancient, pagan Rome. But Babylon the
great harlot cannot be mis-applied to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church,
against which the gates of Hell will not prevail.
There is however, no reason why the terms "Babylon" and "great
harlot" should not apply to an impostor. This preposterous situation exists today
with a counterfeit doctrine (emanating from the city of Rome), expertly marketed as
"catholic" and bought as "catholic" (but without dogmatic authority)
seductive conciliar products which are worldly and, in fact, contrary to the Faith.
As a result of Vatican II ideology, countless souls within the Church are being led astray
to play the harlot under the guise of ecumania. With this in mind then, we now approach
Chapters 17 and 18 of Saint Johns Apocalypse
Babylon the Great
"Babylon the great"
"the great harlot with whom the kings of the
earth committed fornication", sitting on a beast with seven heads and ten horns
"this woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet" (these
happen to be the official colors of bishops and cardinals, cited in ascending rank)
"with a chalice in her hands full of the abominations and filthiness of her
the heads are seven mountains upon which the woman sits" (Rome is
built on seven hills, Septicolis). In Chapter 18 we are told of an angel coming down from
Heaven who cried out loudly, "Babylon the Great is fallen (fallen from grace) and is
become the habitation of devils and the hold of every unclean spirit"
John heard another voice from Heaven saying, "Go out from her my people, that you be
not partakers of her sins and that you receive not her plagues"
After that, the
great harlot was burned, "And her accomplices seeing the smoke of her burning will
cry, Alas! Alas! That great city, Babylon, that mighty city; for in one hour is your
judgment come! Then none shall buy her merchandise
fine linen and purple and
silk and scarlet (the second mention of these two colors, but this time interpolated with
the two fabrics out of which our liturgical vestments have always traditionally been
and the souls of men." (The great harlots merchandise includes souls
traffic in souls) "The merchants of these things will lament from afar saying
Alas! Alas! That great city, which was clothed with fine linen and purple and
scarlet (those two colors for the third and final time) and was gilt with gold and
precious stones and pearls (supernatural graces, the pearl of great price). For in one
hour are so great riches come to naught"
"Rejoice over her you heavens
and you holy apostles and prophets, for God has judged your judgment on her."
Our Lady of Fatima foretold an absolute unconditional victory "in the end"
which is not an allusion to the end of the world, but to the end of this apostasy.
"But finally, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate
Russia to me and it will be converted, and a time of peace will be conceded to the
world." The resolution of our postconciliar plight is dependent upon the Blessed
Virgin Marys agenda as set forth in her Fatima message and devotions. The legacy of
Fatima is one of Holy Hope! Long before 1917 however, throughout the centuries there have
been hundreds of prophecies given to us, which are both relevant and consoling.
Jeanne le Royer (Sister of the Nativity 1731-1798) prophesied: "The New
Constitution will appear to many other than what it really is. They will bless it as a
gift from Heaven; whereas, it is in fact sent from Hell and permitted by God in His Just
wrath. It will only be by its effects that people will be led to recognize the Dragon who
wanted to destroy all and devour all."
"God manifested to me the malice of
Lucifer and the perverse and diabolical intentions of his henchmen against the Holy Church
of Jesus Christ
Through the corrupted breath of their proud spirit, they have
poisoned the minds of men. Like persons infected, with pestilence, they have communicated
the evil to each other and the contagion has become general
The Church in Council
shall one day strike with anathemas, pull down and destroy the evil principles of that
criminal institution. What a consolation! What a joy for the truly faithful!"
Saint Anthony of the Desert (4th Century) prophesied in his Disquisition XIV,
"They will surrender to the Spirit of the age. They will say that if they had lived
in our day, Faith would be simple and easy. But in their day, Faith would be complex; the
Church must be brought up to date and made meaningful to the days problems. When the
Church and the World are one, then those days are at hand. Because Our Divine Master
placed a barrier between His things and the things of the world."
Venerable Bartholomew Holzhauser (17th Century) prophesied about what he called, the
"fifth" and "sixth" periods of the Church. "During the fifth
period, Jesus Christ will purge His people through cruel wars, famines, plagues, epidemics
and horrible calamities. He will also afflict and weaken the Latin Church with many
heresies. It is a period of defections, calamities and extermination
period, God guides the Church in several ways
by interposing the Council of Trent
like a light in the darkness, so that Christians who see the light may know what to
During this period many men will abuse the freedom of conscience conceded to
During this unhappy period there will be laxity in divine and human precepts.
Discipline will suffer. The holy canons will be completely disregarded and the clergy will
not respect the laws of the Church. Everyone will be carried away and led to believe and
do what he fancies according to the manner of the flesh. They will ridicule Christian
simplicity; they will call it folly and nonsense, but they will have the highest regard
for advanced knowledge and for the skill by which the axioms of the law, the precepts of
morality, the holy canons and religious dogmas are clouded by senseless questions and
elaborate arguments. As a result, no principle at all, however holy, authentic, ancient
and certain it may be, will remain free of censure, criticism, false interpretations,
modifications and delineation by man. These are very evil times; a century full of dangers
and calamities. Heresy is everywhere and the followers of heresy are in power almost
everywhere. Bishops, prelates and priests say that they are doing their duty; that they
are vigilant, and that they live as befits their state in life. In this manner therefore,
they all seek excuses. But God will permit a great evil against His Church. Heretics and
tyrants will come suddenly and unexpectedly; they will break into the Church while the
bishops, prelates and priests are asleep."
After the "fifth" period, "God will console His Holy Church for the
affliction and great tribulation which she has endured
All nations will become
Catholic. Vocations will be abundant as never before, and all men will seek only the
Kingdom of God and His justice. Men will live in peace and this will be granted because
people will make their peace with God
There will be many saints and doctors of the
Church on earth. Peace will reign over the whole earth, because God will bind Satan for a
number of years until the days of the Son of Perdition. No one will be able to pervert the
Word of God, since, during the sixth period, there will be an ecumenical Council which
will be the greatest of all Councils. By the Grace of God, by the power of the Great
Monarch, by the authority of the Holy Pontiff and by the union of the most devout princes,
atheism and every heresy will be banished from the earth. The Council will define the true
sense of Holy Scripture and this will be believed and accepted by everyone."
Jeanne le Royer (q.v.) also had prophesied: "I see in God a large assembly of
pastors who will uphold the rights of the Church and of the Head. They will restore the
former disciplines. I see in particular, two servants of Our Lord who will distinguish
themselves in this glorious struggle and who, by the grace of the Holy Ghost, will fill
with ardent zeal, the hearts of this illustrious assembly. All the false cults will be
abolished; all the abuses of the Revolution will be destroyed and the altars of the true
God restored. The former practices will be put into force again and our religion
will flourish more than ever."
Saint Nicholas of Flue (d. 1487) foretold that, "The Church will be punished
because the majority of her members, high and low, will become so perverted. The Church
will sink deeper and deeper until she at last seems to be extinguished, and the succession
of Peter and the other apostles to have expired. But, after this, she will be victoriously
exalted in the sight of all doubters."
Ven. Mary of Agreda (17th Century) wrote, "It was revealed to me that through the
intercession of the Mother of God, all heresies will disappear. The victory over heresies
has been reserved by Christ for His Blessed Mother. In the latter days, the Lord will in a
special manner, spread the renown of His Mother. Mary began salvation and by her
intercession, it will be completed. Before the Second Coming of Christ, Mary more than
ever, must shine in mercy, might and grace in order to bring unbelievers into the Catholic
Faith. The power of Mary in the latter days will be very conspicuous. Mary will extend the
reign of Christ over the heathens and the Mohammedans; and it will be a time of great joy
when Mary is enthroned as Mistress and Queen of Hearts."
Saint Louis de Montfort prophesied, "The power of Mary over all devils will be
particularly outstanding in the last period of time. She will extend the Kingdom of Christ
over the idolaters and Moslems, and there will come a glorious era in which Mary will be
Ruler and Queen of human hearts."
Saint Maximilian Kolbe (d.1941) wrote, "Modem times are dominated by Satan. The
conflict with Hell cannot be engaged in by men, even the most clever. Immaculate Mary
alone has from God the promise of victory over Satan. Our age is the age of the
Immaculata. The serpent will raise his head over the whole earth, but the Immaculate One
is going to crush him through decisive victories
Then heresies and schisms will be
extinguished and hardened sinners, thanks to Immaculate Mary, will return to God
all pagans will be baptized. Thus will be accomplished what Saint Catherine (Labouré) had
foretold: that the Immaculata will become Queen of the whole world, and of each one in
On the subject of prophecy, it is interesting to note that there are only two names
left on St. Malachys list of popes. Attributed to the Archbishop of Armagh and
discovered in the Vatican archives, St. Malachys papal prophecy was first published
in 1590. Although the authorship is disputed, the fact remains that the terse Latin
phrases did actually fit all our popes since that time with uncanny accuracy. Here then
are the final seven popes as listed.
Pius XII "Pastor Angelicus" (Angelic Shepherd) Jesus appeared once
personally to him in 1954 Pius XII was opposed to calling as an ecumenical council
as he believed it too to dangerous at this time. Next came John XXIII "Pastor et
Nauta" (Shepherd and Sailor) former Patriarch of Venice, city of canals
He convened the Second Vatican Council, but died after the first session. Then came Paul
VI "Flos Florum" (Flower of Flowers) his coat of arms had the
fleur-de-lis he presided over the Council and implemented the changes. John Paul I
"De Medietate Lunae" (From the Half of the Moon) Albino Luciani, who
reigned only one month, had the first two letters of his surname forming half of
"luna" (Latin for "moon").
Presently we have John Paul II "De Labore Solis" (Of the Labor of the Sun)
who was born 18 May, 1920, during a "laboring sun" a solar eclipse. Is it
possible the end of his life will coincide with another sign in the heavens, another
"laboring sun", or in fact no sun at all such as during the "Three
Days of Darkness"? This controversial event was foretold by so many saints a
global chastisement reminiscent of the ninth plague over Egypt.
More somber however, is the spiritual interpretation of "De Labore
"Labor" means "struggle" and "sun"
represents "the light of Divine Truth". Ergo, "Struggle over Divine
Truth" is intimated. Since the sun is prominent in this pseudonym and as the clock of
Fatima is still ticking, we could also include the symbols of the Apocalypse (12:1)
"And a great sign appeared in the heavens, a woman clothed with the sun"
hence, "labor" = "struggle" and "woman" = "Church"
and "sun" = "Light of Divine Truth," which does reflect this present
apostasy and is certainly a "struggle in the Church over the Truth." The
"woman" of the Apocalypse is also used as a symbol for the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Pope John Paul II has not yet obeyed Our Lady of Fatimas requests, despite the
evidence of Her stupendous Miracle of the Sun and in spite of the fact he survived the
assassins bullets on 13 May 1981. On 13 May 1917 Our Lady promised: "Afterwards
I shall return here yet a seventh time." (This sentence followed immediately after
Her reference to Her six consecutive visits) Post-conciliar books do not always include
these words of Our Lady, which are contained in the official account by Sr. Lucia in her
Third Memoir. Some people have speculated about what this promised return means, but Sr.
Lucia has neither explained to anyone, nor has she acknowledged fulfillment of Our
Ladys words to date. Obviously the word "here" means the Cova and does not
relate to Her appearances to Sr. Lucia in Spain. If the Great Miracle of the Sun marked
the Blessed Virgins sixth public apparition, one wonders what could be entailed in
the event Our Lady of Fatima is to return there yet a seventh and perhaps final time. John
Paul II needs our prayers now, as never before. The "laboring sun" is
approaching sunset, while the outstanding work of our day, requested at the dawn of our
century in Fatima, is left undone.
The penultimate pope on St. Malachys list "De Gloria Olivae" (From the
Glory of the Olive) seems to correspond to the "Saint" Pope of so many blessed
prophecies. The olive branch is a symbol of peace. Our Lady of Fatima promised to us in
the end, an era of universal peace. Perhaps this next pope will be the "saint"
chosen to preside over the Reign of Peace. He is described often as a French prelate. The
last pope on this list is "Petrus Romanus" (Peter the Roman), obviously Peter
II. We began with a Peter and by this account, we shall end with a Peter the Pope
dressed in red the martyr, who lays down his life for his sheep during the final
battle against the Man of Sin, the Son of Perdition, the Antichrist.
Finally, on the subject of popes, there is a pious Roman legend associated with the
archbasilica of Saint Paul-Outside-the-Walls, regarding its frieze of papal portraits
beginning with St. Peter up to the present time. It is said that when the spaces are all
used up, this will be a sign that the last days are near at hand. There are very few
spaces left. At this rate, we may not get as far as a "coming fourth
millennium", but it appears the "Coming Third Millennium" will be quite
different from the Vatican agenda planned today. Pope Pius XII prophesied that the Church
would be thoroughly cleansed before the Year AD 2000.
There is a certain apprehension with respect to these last Trinitarian years (which
unfortunately were not immediately preceded by a Marian Year). Nevertheless, 1997
dedicated to Jesus Christ has passed, whilst even His Own received Him not
Now, as we proceed with the Year of the Holy Spirit, we might expect to avoid endeavors
contrary to the Will of God, yet falsely attributed to the working of the Holy Spirit.
Blasphemous claims of this sort will surely not go unpunished. Christ taught that sins
against the Holy Ghost are so serious, they will never be forgiven. Therefore, if the
Paraclete is increasingly cited as the author of false ecumenism and charismatic
activities, this could precipitate our chastisement by God the Father. It may be that when
cleansed, the surviving prodigal children will come home to the era of peace promised by
Our Lady at Fatima. The cleansing of the Church alluded to by Pius XII is encompassed by
the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Let us pray we are spared to see it.
The Great Jubilee
This appeal for an infallible judgment on the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council now
turns toward the Great Jubilee. After concentrating on past defects and present effects of
the Council, we look towards the future. To what extent have the errors of Vatican II
influenced the Holy Sees itinerary leading up to the "Year 2000"?
The official Vatican agenda for 1995-1999 outlined by Pope John Paul II in his
Apostolic Letter on the "Coming Third Millennium", Tertio Millennio
Adveniente. A general synopsis reveals that the thrust of this document, possessed by
the spirit of ecumenism, is to push and press for the unity of all Christians and all of
mankind if possible, into a single global ethic by the Year 2000. Incomprehensibly, the
usual Christian term "AD 2000" is not used in this lengthy papal
text. Also absent is the indisputable fact that Vatican II has been utterly impotent in
stemming the tide of apostasy, heresy, schism, blasphemy, scandal and vice for the past 30
years. Tertio Millennio Adveniente is instead peppered with conciliar references
and quotes, cited in support of a litany of praises for the said Council. Yet any
calculated omission of the facts is simply a deliberate contradiction of reality, whilst
an arbitrary reversal of reality is plain dis-information or untruth.
Ubiquitous and obsequious conciliar adulation, along with a fanatical adoration of the
pope (papolatry), cannot be regarded as Catholic responses. Conciliarism reminds one of
the classic fable about the Emperors New Clothes, wherein he paraded around in a
loincloth, whilst his courtiers loudly complimented him on his non-existent fine robes.
Conciliarism gives rise to an identical situation. Vatican II, the fallible "pastoral"
Council, is lauded and given credence due only to an infallible (dogmatic)
Council. This sycophantic and schizoid anomaly is endemic to the fans of the Council,
together with all those merchants-of-happiness who promote this "Civilization of
Love" a phrase coined by Pope Paul VI. But even here, the paradox is obvious,
since it was Paul VI himself who noted after the Council that the "Smoke of
Satan" had entered the Church. Subsequently, our Catholic noses, alerted by these
fumes, were led to discover the original bonfire. Indeed, the smoke could never have
entered our Church without the flames set by Vatican II. How will the air be cleared? By
an ex-cathedra judgment on the Council and its teachings, or by a Divine intervention?
Unless some good bishops come to the aid of the Church very soon, the latter seems
inevitable. Conciliar ecumenism has relegated the Mother of God to a private back seat in
the millennium preparations. How could Catholic thinking have been so profoundly altered
since the Council?
In reviewing the official agenda for the Great Jubilee, it transpires that we were all
required to have made an examination of conscience over the first two years (1995 and
1996), and to have repented for our sins and the sins of all our ancestors in the
so-called "sins of the Church" throughout history. 1997 was proclaimed as a year
dedicated to Jesus Christ; 1998 is devoted to the Holy Spirit and 1999 is going to be the
year of God the Father. The Pope says "Mary" will be "contemplated"
and "imitated" during this time.
Our Ladys Role
Did we really need two whole years to review our consciences? Why did we not begin our
5-year-plan with a year to repent for our sins and the second year officially dedicated to
the Mother of God? In this way, she would immediately have preceded her Sons year,
just as she prepared the way for His first Advent. But the fact is, Our Lady is to be kept
as much as possible out of public sight by the Vatican as we approach Year
2000. If these prelates are honest about this situation, they must admit that the last
Marian Year, celebrated back in 1986-87, was too far in the past to provide any visible
link with the coming Year 2000. How is it possible in our brave new Church, that we are so
preoccupied with the Rights of Man and the Dignity of the Human Person decrying all
manner of discrimination, whilst over-looking our own Mother Mary? In planning for the
Great Jubilee, what better opportunity could there have been for the Catholic Church under
Peter to faithfully proclaim the role of the Blessed Virgin Mary to the whole world in
unambiguous terms as "Mother of God" and to publicly honor her sovereignty as "Queen
of Heaven and earth." Yet, the Vatican excluded her from the public domain
presumably not to offend the sensibilities of the non-Catholic world and not to
impair or compromise any grandiose "ecumenical incentives".
How will the Head of the Church, Our Lord Jesus Christ, regard such neglect of His
Mother, whilst we cavort and consort instead with the Protestants and the Moslems and Jews
on Mount Sinai in expansive displays of ecumania? It was not unreasonable to expect
Christs Vicar on earth, our self-proclaimed "Marian" pope, to have
insisted on leading the human race in universal homage to his Mistress and Queen. Sadly,
in reading Tertio Millennio Adveniente, no one would ever guess that Mary is
actually Queen of Heaven and earth. Marys Queenship and all mention of it has been
completely avoided. Additionally, the fact that Our Lady was given to us as the Mediatrix
between mankind and Jesus Christ (proven at Cana by His first public miracle done
exclusively at her pleading) is omitted entirely. Instead, we are told that "Christ
is the one Mediator between God and man" several times lest we forget. But that is
only half the truth, is it not? The whole truth is that God gave us His Mother to be our
Mediatrix with God-made-Man. Catholics have always believed that Our Ladys God-given
role as Mediatrix was not merely limited to her Divine Maternity in bringing the Redeemer
into the world, but that Mary intercedes constantly for us with her Son in a real,
practical and in the most efficacious way. We were not led to doubt before Vatican II that
Jesus Christ showered all His graces upon us through her intercession and administration
as Queen of Heaven. Yet by means of this total exclusion of Our Lady as Mediatrix in Tertio
Millennio Adveniente Her uniquely powerful role is implicitly denied.
In this verbose Apostolic Letter of over 16,000 words, Mary is mentioned very few times
with only three paragraphs devoted to her (and at that, strictly in relation to the
Trinitarian years). If this is Vatican II ideology, it is lethal for Marian devotion,
since any publicity surrounding Our Lady is very wishy-washy or has been purged from the
Vaticans official agenda. Indeed, she "will be indirectly present",
according to John Paul II, during 1995 and 1996. Then she "will be contemplated"
during 1997, the Year of Jesus Christ. And "she will be contemplated and
imitated" in 1998, the Year of the Holy Spirit and "her motherhood will be
felt" during 1999, the Year of the Father. How and by whom? Under such vague
circumstances, let us hope the People of God do not forget about these private meditations
entirely. As an example, how many Catholics let alone anyone else in the world
actually heard of or had access to the contents of the Papal locutions about Mary
However, in the final paragraph of Tertio Millennio Adveniente, John Paul II
entrusts responsibility for the upcoming celebrations to the "maternal
intercession" of Mary (after her implicit disqualification as Mediatrix!): "She,
the Mother of Fairest Love will be for Christians on the way to the Great Jubilee of the
Third Millennium, the Star which safely guides their steps to the Lord." Do
Christians mean Catholics?
How will Protestants ever learn the truth about her when she has been denied an
effective public forum? Indeed, under the prevailing ground rules, She will be a most
discreet "Star" even for Catholic-Christians.
It is ironic that this document urging us to examine the "sins of the Catholic
Church" reveals in itself so grave a deficiency with respect to the Blessed Virgin
Mary. How could a Marian Pope ever permit the Great Mother of God to be set aside? Or
allow the Queen of Heaven to be hidden under a bushel? The faithful are faced with an
enigma. We know John Paul II publicly proclaimed his abandonment to (not of) Mary
"Totus Tuus", as illustrated by the big "M" on his coat of
arms. Yet the symbol of Our Lord the Cross is shunted off-center to one side
by the large "M". In comparison, the Miraculous Medal design, given to us by Our
Lady herself, has her "M" in line with and subordinate to the Cross, which
remains centered. Even if the Cross has been displaced by the symbol of Maria on the papal
crest, we pray the Madonna is never replaced by "Mundi". Petrae quo vadis?
Little Jacinta Marto prayed constantly and made heroic sacrifices "for the Holy
Father", as did Francisco and Lucia, from the moment they learned the contents of the
Third Secret. Venerable Jacinta said she would "pray very much" for the Pope in
Heaven. Lucia (meaning "light") still suffers for him today in her convent. He
has the greatest need of our prayers and sacrifices too especially since he has not
yet fulfilled Our Lady of Fatimas requests. Our Lady of the Rosary was explicit:
"Only She can help you." If we believe this, why then is "She" not
front and center stage in the Great Jubilee millennium agenda?
The explanation for this oversight may be sought in post-conciliar mariology. On the
one hand, we are experiencing an explosion of "Marian" apparitions since Vatican
II. According to Church law, the local Ordinary (usually the Bishop) has the
responsibility to approve or condemn the alleged supernatural events. Only a few of these
recent apparitions have been approved in the first stage. One of those condemned by the
local Bishop was "Our Lady of Medjugorje", who is still allegedly appearing to
several adult seers. At the outset, however, these "seers" admitted on audio
tape to their Bishop that they were in fact teenagers who went outside to smoke cigarettes
behind their parents backs (yet were nevertheless rewarded for their disobedience
with their first vision). The ecumenical "Gospa" subsequently was reported by
her seers as stating it was all right to leave Moslems and others in peace, without trying
to turn them into Christians and Catholics. What mattered was that they be
"good" Moslems et al (albeit unbaptized and unconverted to the One True
Yet it is a fact that all deathbed conversions are to the Catholic religion. It is
unheard-of throughout history, for the dying to convert to Islam, Judaism, or anything
else except to Catholicism. Would it not make sense if the One True Faith is
necessary for our salvation? Yet this garrulous Gospa, who has been talking for over 15
years, is so ecumenical, she is on record as confirming "good" people (in false
religions) need not be converted to the Catholic religion. The Blessed Virgin Mary
a Woman of few words always draws souls into Her Sons Church. In contrast,
the bare feet of the Immaculate white-clothed Lady were visible at Lourdes and Fatima, yet
here the drab gray-clad apparitions feet are covered by a perpetual fog. What is
hidden under that cloud then, cloven hooves?
The conversions to the Church at Medjugorje appear to be genuine, however, if tomorrow
Rome were to infallibly decree that this venue was a beautiful shrine of Satan, how many
would humbly pay heed? How many devotees would be so sure of themselves and their personal
"signs", that they would continue their support? We do not know how many of
these Medjugorje conversions or re-conversions are more committed to the apparition than
they are to the Church. What we do know is that this talkative and un-approved "Lady
of Peace" has stolen countless hearts away from Our Ladys true peace plan and
has distracted millions of souls from the approved and paramount Marian apparition of our
On the other hand, if we do not follow the true light at the end of the tunnel, we
shall gravitate towards the headlight of the conciliar train coming at us from the
opposite direction. To our peril since the Council, we Catholics have been targeted by a
diluted brand of mariology, which diffuses the ardent devotion of our Marian Saints and
which contradicts, but mostly ignores the Churchs age-old beliefs on Mary. One is
astonished to discover how much this "sensus fidei" has been damaged by
the new "reformed" religion. In order to recognize this watered-down Mariology,
an evaluation is necessary.
Firstly, in attempting to fathom John Paul IIs stance regarding the Blessed
Virgin, his book Crossing the Threshold of Hope, offers some clues. The Pope
Thanks to Saint Louis of Montfort, I came to understand that true devotion to
the Mother of God is actually Christocentric, indeed, it is very profoundly rooted in the
Mystery of the Blessed Trinity.
This is what St. Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort wrote in his Treatise on True
Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary:
We have not yet praised, exalted, honored, loved and served Mary enough. She
deserves still more praise, still more respect, still more love and still more service.
God wants His Mother at present to be more known, more loved and more honored than She has
The Will of the Most High, Who exalts the humble, is that Heaven, earth
and hell bend with good will, or bad to the commands of the humble Mary, who
He has made Sovereign of Heaven and earth, General of His armies, Treasurer of His
Treasures, Dispenser of His Graces, Worker of His great marvels, Restorer of the human
race, Mediatrix of men, the exterminator of the enemies of God and the faithful Companion
of His grandeurs and triumphs
Yes, as it is certain that the knowledge and reign of
Jesus Christ came into this world, it will be only a necessary result of the knowledge and
reign of the Most Holy Virgin Mary, who sent Him into the world the first time, and who
will cause Him to be manifest a second time.
Secondly, the other Saint mentioned by the Pope in this book is "Father Maximilian
Kolbe". It is worth our while to briefly compare examples of the expressed beliefs of
these two Polish prelates, whose lives overlapped for some two decades. On the one hand,
we have Maximilian Kolbe, the pre-conciliar Marian Saint Knight of the Immaculata;
and on the other, we have Karol Wojtyla, the Pope of the Marian Motto Crusader for
the Council. Theologically, they seem poles apart.
John Paul II writes in Tertio Millennio Adveniente:
Mary who conceived the Incarnate Word by the power of the Holy Spirit and then
the whole of her life allowed herself to be guided by his interior activity, will be
contemplated and imitated during this year above all as the woman who was docile to the
voice of the Spirit, a woman of silence and attentiveness, a woman of hope, who like
Abraham, accepted Gods will hoping against hope. (cf Rom 4:18)
Saint Maximilian Kolbe wrote on the same subject as follows:
O Immaculata! What were your thoughts when for the first time you placed the
Divine Child on His bed of straw?
You knew very well Who that Child was, because
the Prophets had spoken of Him and you understood them better than all the Pharisees and
the learned Scripture scholars. The Holy Spirit had given to you infinitely more
enlightenment that all other souls together! Besides, how many mysteries of Jesus were
revealed only and exclusively to your Immaculate Soul by the Divine Spirit Who lived and
operated within you! At the moment of the Annunciation, you knew perfectly well to Whom
your consent was being given and Whose Mother you were to be.
To Pope John Paul II, Mary is the docile, silent woman who hoped against hope. To Saint
Maximilian Kolbe, his glorious Immaculata understood the prophets better than any genius,
because the Holy Spirit had given her more enlightenment than all mankind put together,
including exclusive mysteries of Jesus; enabling her to know perfectly well, amongst other
things, her mission as Mother of the Messiah and Mother of God. In other words, she knew;
she did not have to "hope against hope".
Why do we get the impression in sterile post-conciliar commentaries that we have been
relegated to a spiritual starvation bunker? We long to hear our Pontiff speak in the
preconciliar Faith of his compatriot. The following is taken from one of Father
Kolbes sermons and reveals the type of teaching those nine condemned men must have
been graced to hear in their starvation bunker at Auschwitz during their protracted
Fear not little flock, fear not; for death is not the end, but the beginning!
Let us just imagine for ourselves, how grateful countless numbers of souls will be to us,
because we opened Heaven for them. And even if we only increased their glory by one
degree, how they will thank us for all eternity. And we will be most grateful to them as
well, for in working for them, we prepare for ourselves a heavenly crown. How they too
will burn with love for Her, who deigned to use us to free them from the shackles of the
Devil! Oh! What a hymn of glory and thanksgiving will be raised by all the inhabitants of
Heaven to the Heart of Jesus; that He gave us so wonderful a Mother! That He created Her
as one so good, that She could not abandon a single sinner, even the worst, who finds
refuge in Her. And She is so powerful that Her desire alone is sufficient to move His
Heart the Heart of our Infinite God.
These expressions of Faith
this Catholic-intimacy-with-the-Divine, was unique to
the Church and attracted many Protestant conversions to Catholicism before the Council.
But now, all is "immanent" with scant focus on what is going to happen to us
beyond the grave. As Hell is minimized or denied, the glories of Heaven can neither be
convincingly described. To preach about the "Good News" without including the
"bad news" the cause and reality of damnation is gross negligence.
In Crossing the Threshold of Hope, the Pontiffs interviewer, the Italian
journalist Messori, remarked that since Vatican II, "more documents have
been produced at every level of the Church than in the entire preceding twenty centuries.
Yet to some it has seemed that this loquacious Church is silent about what is most
essential: eternal life."
Be Not Afraid
When Saint Maximilian Kolbe said "Fear not", he was encouraging the faithful
not to fear death, because it marks the beginning of eternal life. But John Paul II often
says, "Be not afraid!" What does he mean? In Crossing the Threshold of Hope,
the Pope explains:
The words of Christ are repeated by the Church. And with the Church, they are
repeated by the Pope. I have done so since the first homily I gave in St. Peters
Square: Be not afraid! These are not words said into a void. They are
profoundly rooted in the Gospel. They are simply the words of Christ Himself. Of what
should we not be afraid? We should not fear the truth about ourselves.
Where in the Gospels did Christ ever say that we should not fear the truth about
ourselves? Christ did say however: "Be not afraid of them
who kill the body and after that have no more that they can do. But I will show you whom
you fear; fear him who, after he has killed, has power to cast into hell. Yes, I say to
you. Fear him." (Lk. 12:4,5)
So when the Holy Father repeats "Be not afraid!" (of the truth about
ourselves), we are afraid. We are especially afraid every time he refers over and over
again to Vatican II as the basis for all these strange ideas. We are afraid because our
conciliar popes have disobeyed God and refused His Mothers requests at Fatima. On
the contrary, we would be very foolish indeed, if we did not fear the truth about
Now the Millennium draws near. History is repeating itself when one recalls that during
the First Advent there was no room for the Virgin Mary at the inn. So now too, thanks to
Vatican II ecumenism, there is no decent place for her in the Jubilee Calendar. We know
the Blessed Virgin came ahead of her Divine Son for the First Advent and so, in like
manner, she will again precede Christ to prepare the way for His Second Coming. This is
the teaching of many canonized Saints. Our Lord sends His Mother ahead of Himself on both
occasions. God needed her in His plans. How presumptuous of us to consider we do not need
her as central to ours for the Great Jubilee! This is her anniversary too, recalling that
moment in time when she brought the Savior into the world. But Rome has not rallied us to
prepare for the great anniversary of Christs Birth by making reparation to Him
through the Immaculate Heart of Mary for the antediluvian magnitude of evils in the world
today. Rome no longer leads us by means of the Five First Saturdays devotion to take
shelter as Christ did, before his Birth under the Heart of His Mother. Neither do
the champions of Vatican II preach from the rooftops about our urgent need for the brown
scapular, even though Our Lady of Carmel appeared with scapular in hand during the Great
Miracle of the Sun at Fatima to remind us. What is it then, the mere "folklore of
Saint Joseph also appeared at Fatima to bless the world, yet he too has been ignored
since Vatican II. Saint Joseph was sloughed off in Tertio Millennio Adveniente with
exactly one mention, as "Joseph," uncanonized, without even the prefix
"Saint"! This "just man" is totally exiled from their "Great
Jubilee", reminding us of when he was forced to flee with Our Lady and the Christ
Child so long ago. What pivotal role will he play as the cosmic drama foretold at Fatima
unfolds? Who then exactly was this "just man"?
Saint Joseph was not merely a deceived husband who was miraculously consoled by an
angel. Being a "just man" (Mt. 1:19), he was virtuous, upright and righteous.
Why then did he resolve to send Mary away? If he was "just", he was obliged to
denounce her publicly if he really was upright. And if he thought she was innocent, then
he would have been unjust to send her away. The explanation could be that St. Joseph
already knew the secret of her virginal Conception, as reflected by the angels words
to him thus: "Joseph, Son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for (you
know) that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit". (Mt. 1:20) Could it be
that St. Joseph did not want to appear in the eyes of the world to be the father of the
Son of God? If so, he would have planned to send Our Lady away quietly, out of obedience
to the Will of God, thinking God had plans for Mary which did not include him. But God did
have an unsurpassed role for St. Joseph as Guardian and Protector of Emmanuel and His
Mother. The Blessed Virgin was not intended to find herself facing the world as a single
mother. By taking Mother and Child into his home, and since St. Joseph and Our Lady were
both of the Royal House of David, the Scriptures would be fulfilled perfectly and without
scandal. St. Joseph was the first after the Blessed Virgin to accept Jesus as an integral
part of his life. He was also the first to behold the Son of God in His Mothers
arms. This "just man", this StepFather of Jesus, this Head of the Holy Family
and Patron of the Universal Church has been banished from the Vaticans
"New Springtime" agenda. But soon it seems, there will be a "new
springtime" given by God to His Church, after the conciliar leaven has been purged.
Official recognition and devotion to Saint Joseph will be rehabilitated. St. John Bosco
gave us a few hints. The reredos of the altar dedicated to St. Joseph at the basilica of
Our Lady Help of Christians in Turin, was painted according to Don Boscos
directives. The Holy Family is depicted above the church in the clouds. St. Joseph is
dropping down the roses handed to him by the Child Jesus in his arms. Our Lady is standing
next to her spouse. Don Bosco wrote: "The flowers represent the graces offered by
Jesus to Mary, but Mary makes Saint Joseph their absolute administrator. As Holy Church
proclaims (at the end of the Litany of St. Joseph) He made him lord of His household and
prince of all His possessions".
St. John Bosco prophesied that "between two full moons in the month of the
flowers", the symbol of peace the rainbow would rise above the earth. He
foretold the sun on that occasion would shine with a greater luminosity than during the
first Pentecost above the cenacle. We should be aware that in northern Italy, March is
known as the "month of the flowers". Moreover, there are two full moons in March
1999 and St. Josephs Feast falls between them. Could this be the time for the sun to
shine again at the dawn of the Reign of Peace after the frightful days of darkness?
If so, this will be the visible symbol of a real universal springtime by Gods Will
to displace the present man-made mirage our so-called conciliar
"Springtime". Before Vatican II, we were reminded to "Go to Joseph".
If we go to him now during this storm, he may come to us in a special way in the time of
peace. It is not inconceivable that St. Josephs incorrupt body will be found during
the Reign of the Immaculate Heart. Fr. Paul of Moll (d.1894) was of the opinion: "In
ecstasy a Saint has seen the body of St. Joseph preserved intact in a tomb, the site of
which is yet unknown. The more the glorious spouse of the Most Holy Virgin is honored, the
sooner will the finding of his body take place, which will be a day of great rejoicing for
the Church". And Isidore of Solanis, a pious Dominican of the 16th century, foretold
that towards the end of time, God will overwhelm St Joseph with glorious honors".
Obviously the tenebrae of our apostatic age is a spiritual darkness with the eclipse of
the True Light. But perhaps we shall also endure a physical darkness as prophesied by over
300 saintly souls over the past millennium. St. Hildegard of Bingen, St. Caspar del Bufalo
of the Precious Blood devotion, Bl. Anna Maria Taigi, Bl. Elizabeth Canori Mora,
the "Little Arab" Sr. Mary of Jesus Crucified of Pau, Bl. Faustina of the
Divine Mercy Devotion (to name just a few), all warned of a similar universal
chastisement. Whether the result of a nuclear war or a rogue meteorite or comet, there
apparently is to come three days of darkness (dies irae in triduum) over the whole
earth. We are instructed to stay locked indoors, to pray and remain within the light of a
blessed candle, to cover the windows and ignore all else. Similar to the ninth and tenth
plagues of Egypt, the forces of Hell will wreak havoc. Some saints say it will be like a
mini-Judgment and that two thirds of humanity will perish. Pharaoh must have thought this
sort of thing was far-fetched too, until three days of darkness fell and the Angel of
Death swept through his land. Given the state of this world and of the Church, it is a
miracle that God has not yet permitted a global punishment. There is no safe place to hide
in the event these things come to pass. All that is required of us is to remain in a state
of sanctifying grace, to pray for those who are not ready to meet their Maker and to keep
looking forward amidst all tribulations, to the coming Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of
Since the dark clouds heralding our chastisement are gathering, we shall need to keep
ourselves and our children away from ecumenical orgies and other forms of conciliar
man-worshipping for the Millennium. Although we might fear the climax of Hells
harvest, Our Lord will never abandon His Church. As long as we remain faithful, Our Lady
will shelter us and St. Joseph will protect us, as prefigured at Fatima. One day we shall
see exactly how, within the Church, the One True Faith was kept burning throughout this
apostasy as the sanctuary lamp shines to light up the Tabernacle all through a dark
night. We, who are loyal Roman Catholics who truly love our Church refuse to
leave her in her darkest hour. Without her and without our Pope and the clergy in union
with him (notwithstanding their extreme weakness or perversity), we shall be orphans. This
is our crucifixion. It is not a time for personal consolation, but rather the final stage
of suffering with and for the Church. Our vocation, as the "remnant", is to keep
the Faith, whilst avoiding heresy and schism. It is also our privilege to fight for the
Church and to defend the Truth, without falling prey to bitterness or any sheepish
When faced with the errors of Vatican II, we are not obliged to follow blind guides
into the abyss. Saint John Eudes taught that the "floor of Hell is paved with the
skulls of bishops". And St. John Chrysostom said that "most bishops are lost and
few priests are saved" not only because of what they do, but as a result of
what they fail to do. Then there is that axiom: "A bad pastor either leads or follows
his flock to hell." Our canonized saints were not duped into being
"non-judgmental"! Of course Christ taught us not to judge others (their hearts)
lest we be judged. But these words from the Sermon on the Mount are immediately followed
by His admonition for us not to throw what is holy to dogs, nor to cast our pearls before
swine. Obviously, we have to judge what is holy and what is not and to discern
"dogs" and "swine". The fact is, we are faced with having to make
prudential judgments every day. If we are afraid to make evaluations or to
"judge", we abdicate our God-given free will and cannot make correct moral
However, some groups in the Church nowadays are of the opinion that "yes"
there are problems in the light of Tradition with Vatican II and this or that Popes
teachings, but "no", we should not dare to criticize or presume to question our
leaders. In fact, these people believe we must hide all scandal and use the example of
Noahs sons walking backwards with a cover to throw over their fathers
nakedness, when he inadvertently became drunk. Polemics aside, when our salvation is at
stake we cannot turn our backs and cover up the danger, pretending it should not be seen.
We shall simply fall down more quickly into the pit backwards instead of forwards.
We are compelled to resist sin. There is no excuse for us who know the Fatima Message to
allow ourselves to be led into error by that "diabolic disorientation affecting even
the best of minds", which Sr. Lucia foretold. Fatima expert, Fr. Alonso opined that
the Third Secret revealed details of the deficiencies and devastating disorders at the
highest levels of the Church. This is no doubt why Sr. Lucia wrote (before her
post-conciliar confinement and silencing) that the faithful must not wait for the call to
penance to come from Rome. We shall wait in vain. Our Lord requires our expiation now,
in order for us to save our own souls first, and then as many others around us as
In fact, Rome has been exhorting us at this time to examine our consciences. Pope John
Paul II wrote in Tertio Millennio Adveniente:
"An examination of conscience must also consider the reception given to the
Council, this great gift of the Spirit to the Church at the end of the Second
Millennium". (Emphasis added) Ironically, compliance with that particular directive
gave rise to this appeal. Indeed, when considering our "reception given to the
Council", we concur with Cardinal Alfredo Ottavianis candid observation that
if the Church had not been a divine institution Vatican II would have
destroyed her completely. Since the Barque of Peter has been so mutilated, those still on
board have the right to know exactly by what means the Mystery of Iniquity has been able
to immobilize and dupe her crewmen. The laity are not all hoodwinked. By the Grace of God,
some souls are neither spiritually moribund, nor intellectually brain-dead. An honest
examination of conscience clearly reveals that a slavish conformism to the flawed ideology
of this "pastoral Council has systematically replaced the true Catholic
religion with a false Catholic-in-name-only cult. Our Ark of Salvation bears no
resemblance to this ship of fools. Vatican II, like the "unsinkable" Titanic,
was also launched on a disastrous course surrounded by boasting, bluster, vanity and
folly. Metaphorically speaking, Conciliarism is worse. The real Titanic had some
lifeboats, but this fallible human misconception has none at all and it too, will
sink. Meantime, the obvious chaotic conciliar consequences in our beloved Church
constitute an unparalleled disgrace. Yet whose consciences must bear the guilt for this?
After all, the "Renewal" was unilaterally imposed upon the poor people in the
Where does this fact leave the Pontiff and his hierarchy as the supreme and
assistant administrators of this ongoing debacle? On the subject of this reality, have
they been inclined to examine their own consciences as well?
In Our Ladys words, repeated by Saint Bernadette at Lourdes:
"Penance! Penance! Penance!"
For their sins! For our sins! And for the
sins of the world!
At least some of us have been faithful for many years, offering up our Rosaries,
sufferings and penances in the spirit of reparation, as requested by Our Lady of Fatima.
Since the Council, our lives have been one long Purgatory of dis-Ordo in the trials of
"Novo-Novo Land". What better service, then, could we render in the salvation of
souls than to strive by all means possible to hasten the Reign of Christ the King
coming to us through the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary? We are consoled in the
fore-knowledge that the Blessed Virgin will crush the serpents head by removing the
greatest impediment to her Victory. The Rosary moves mountains. Indeed, it is our weapon
to dis-lodge the Masonic/demonic principles of Vatican II and its devotion to Faith in
Man. We cannot believe in the "truth of mans freedom" as the Conciliarists
preach, since we, as Catholics, believe in the freedom of Gods Truth.
Our Lord referred to His second advent with a lament, "But the Son of Man when He
comes, shall He find faith on earth?" (Lk. 18:8) This tribulation of our cosmic age
cannot be reduced to mere battles over the loss of our Immemorial Mass or to wrestling
with the controversial private teachings of transitory Popes, when the very existence of
our Catholic Faith is in jeopardy. For over thirty years authentic Catholicism has been
exiled by a conciliar "Catholicism". The pathetic vestige of our Catholic
religion now hangs by a thread. In this frenzy to empty out divine content, consider what
has been the direct pastoral result of Vatican II the loss of Faith in millions and
the denial of the Truth to billions of souls on earth. Let us then unite to put on the
armor of God and join the counter-attack against the only effective target the
beating heart of the Cult of Man, embodied in the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council.
Venerable Brethren of the Episcopate, is there not an Athanasius or a John Fisher to be
found among you? Are you aware of the reason why Saint John Fisher had the grace to defend
the Catholic Church? He was the only English bishop during the early reign of Henry VIII
who did not have a mistress. He was pure of heart. He could therefore see the Truth,
whilst his corrupt confreres were emasculated by fear of blackmail and subject to
extortion for their hidden sins of the past. These men had the power to save the Church in
England from the heretical Church of England. But they did nothing. On
the contrary, the one good shepherd amongst them went down in our annals as a Saint and a
Martyr. Therefore illustrious Lord Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals
critical time in the history of the Church, have a care for your immortal souls!
for our souls too. It is your clarion call. Search you hearts
Let us pray that somewhere, somehow, some bishop(s) may receive the grace
to ring in the death knell for this apostasy. Not by petitioning, but by requiring the
Pope to set aside his own desires and to deliver a solemn Ex-Cathedra Judgment on the
texts of Vatican II. This simple solution would take only a few Petrine moments of time.
All is prepared. The cavernous conciliar grave is dug and its casket is open to receive
the corpse. In other words, the errors of the Council and its noxious teachings have been
documented now awaiting some blessed bishops to conduct the burial. However, an
absence of Churchmen will not avert this inevitable interment. The funeral pyre must then
by necessity be imposed by Divine Justice a conciliar cremation, when the earth is
cleansed through fire. Even the adepts of the Craft admit this satanic recognition in
their esoteric abuse of the Sacred Initials, "I.N.R.I." to which they
attribute instead "Igne Natura Renovatur Integra" (meaning "all nature will
be renewed by fire"). There is still time to drive a stake into the heart of the
Beast, but we can be sure any initiative to derail the conciliar juggernaut, will be
violently opposed by the Pharisees of our day. Nevertheless, if God wills it, such a
crusade, under the aegis of Our Lady of Fatima, would proceed with the protection of the
Holy Angels and would certainly succeed. Sadly, there may not be a single Bishop left in
the world who, like the Saints of old, would have the courage to fight for the Faith.
Immaculate Heart of Mary
On the other hand, Our Lord may wish to send His Blessed Mother Mary herself, to free
her children by means of an obvious miracle, from the toxic fallout of Vatican II and all
that other un-Catholic rubbish heaped upon us for so many years. We know the Papal and
Episcopal Consecration of Russia is long overdue, as is, no doubt, our chastisement. Thank
Heaven the time is short now! It seems not years, but only months to count before the
Triumph of Our Lady of Fatima, the exaltation of Saint Joseph and the Reign of the Sacred
Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
"Who is she that cometh forth as the morning rising,
Fair as the dawn, bright as the sun,
Terrible as an army set in battle array,
O Mary conceived without sin,
Pray for us who have recourse to Thee."
Maranatha! Come soon Lord Jesus, come soon! Amen.
This appeal for an Ex-Cathedra Judgment on Vatican II comes spontaneously from an
informal source, without the auspices of any particular organization. Nevertheless, this
author remains indebted to the Contre-Réforme Catholique (CRC) and its founding
Father, the Abbé Georges de Nantes. It must be stressed that although a number of his
insights have been included, the responsibility for the overall content of this appeal
lies strictly with the author. However, the central thesis is credited to the Abbés
conclusion; i.e. that the erroneous texts of this fallible "Pastoral" Council
require a solemn judgment and rectification, and until such is granted, it is not possible
to resolve the chaotic conciliar consequences in the Church. Furthermore, it is necessary
to acknowledge the Abbés devotional, instructional and polemical writings, without
which, this appeal (pale by comparison), would probably never have been written. For those
who wish to have direct access to more information on these subjects, there is now an
internet site for the English version of the CRC at: